Water Propulsion Device - geometry configuratiton optimization problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a water propulsion device utilizing fire hydrant pressure to lift a payload into a burning building. The creator seeks advice on how water flow, pressure, and exit area configurations affect thrust and overall performance. A mathematical model is presented to calculate the total mass, payload, and thrust, with specific attention to the nozzle configuration and potential pressure loss due to height. Concerns about the calculations and the practicality of the design are raised, including whether a side or bottom hose attachment would be more effective. The creator plans to test a smaller prototype using a standard house water hose for further validation.
Lizik
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear physicist,

I am designing a device that will use firetruck/hydrant water pressure (~150 psi) and fire hose (5" diameter) to lift up a device in the air and into a burning room. Please advice me and help understand how water flow, pressure and areas influence thrust. My goal is to input pressure and area of source -> math model -> output payload, thrust, max height achieved. I have the control over design of the exit flows and their configuration.

Here is the inspiration video:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=66e_1397564023

This is a 2D mathematical model that I have for payload calculations.
m_total = mass of hose + mass of water
m_total = x*cross sectional area*density + constant (hose weight per m)*(x^2+y^2)^1/2
where y is height and x is the horizontal distance the device needs to travel (~ 4m - from hydrant to the building which is standard street distance away)
Payload = g*m_total (750N or 170 lb for y = 12.2 m or 4 story)
The pump does work of lifting the water vertically but the device needs to carry water weight when it moves horizontally away from the source. x is a horizontal projection.

Now for the hard part:

For simplicity and for ease of control, a four valve/nozzle configuration is my choice. I attached a link to a picture to better describe it. --> http://imgur.com/qkK8C3e

Maybe its better to attach the source hose from the side instead of the bottom. It will make it difficult for manufacture and control so if its not very influential on thrust, then a bottom configuration would work better.

I've been using "Carried by impulse: The physics of water jetpacks"
written by Matthew Vonk and Peter Bohacek from Physics Today to estimate my thrust capabilities. I think I can use this formula to have 4 equal areas for exit. (thrust 215 lb). v = Q/A

Possible acceleration of the drone = F_net (Thrust - payload)/m_total = 2.62 m/s^2
(something is not right about this)

Pressure loss from height:
P source = density*g*hmax+P atm ---> hmax is where you lose all pressure. (95 m with 150 psi P source which doesn't seem right either) How does pressure influence the thrust?

I am not sure about my calculations. Please advice, I would really appreciate it. I will be testing a smaller design with a house water hose. I will provide pictures and data to who ever will help out.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

Seems kind of wasteful and limited in usefulness. Why not just use a standard ladder truck?
 
Berkeman, I would like to calculate the actual numbers and possibilities. If you like to help me just for the though exercise, I would appreciate it.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top