Wave dispersion and the bandwidth theorem

RYANDTRAVERS
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a propagating wave packet with initial length L0.
Use the bandwidth theorem to show that the minimum range of angular frequencies present in the wave packet is approximately:
\begin{equation}
\Delta \omega = \frac{v_{g}}{L_{0}}
\end{equation}
where vg is the group velocity.

Homework Equations


The dispersion relationship for the wave is:
\begin{equation}
\omega ^{2} = gk
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution


attached as photo along with original problem sheet. For some reason I get the answer as:
\begin{equation}
\Delta \omega = 2\pi \frac{v_{g}}{L_{0}}
\end{equation}
see method attached.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2657.JPG
    IMG_2657.JPG
    42.1 KB · Views: 1,099
  • IMG_2658.JPG
    IMG_2658.JPG
    65.9 KB · Views: 751
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes i agree with your result. but how exactly have you been taught the bandwidth theorem? I just know it as \Delta k\Delta x\approx 2\pi where \Delta k , \Delta x are defined properly.
 
Last edited:
Well, yeah we defined it as \begin{equation} \Delta k \Delta x = 2\pi \end{equation} and then the rest can be derived from there.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top