How Does v^2 in the Wave Equation Represent Wave Speed?

AI Thread Summary
The wave equation describes wave motion on a string, with the relationship v^2 = Tension/linear density indicating wave speed. The derivation shows that if a function satisfies the wave equation, it can be transformed to demonstrate that it propagates at speed c. The approximation holds well for small waves, but extreme tension can lead to permanent deformation of the string. By analyzing forces and using calculus, the wave equation is confirmed as d²y/dx² = (1/c²)d²y/dt², establishing c² = T/δ. This discussion clarifies the connection between tension, linear density, and wave speed in the context of wave propagation.
amiras
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
The wave on the string could be described with wave equation.

Wave equation has a factor v^2 = Tension/linear density.

It has dimensions of speed, but from where exactly does it follow that this is actually speed of propagation of the wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v^2 has dimensions of speed squared. You can calculate the forces in the string based on the deflection in the string, and get this formula as a result. I'm sure there are textbooks where this derivation is done.
 
That can be interpreted as either (or both) of two questions:
1) How do we know that
\dfrac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}= \frac{1}{c^2}\dfrac{\partial^2y}{\partial t^2}
(the "wave equation) does describe wave motion with wave speed "c"?

2) How do we show that the movement of a string, under tension T and with linear density \delta satisfies the wave equation with c= T/\delta?

To answer the first one, suppose that f(x, t) satisfies the wave equation. Let g(x, t)= f(x- ct_0, t- t_0). Show that g(x, t) also satisfies the wave equation. Of course, g(x, t) is just f(x, t) with time shifted by t_0 and distance shifted by c t_0 so that the difference in distances is ct_0 for a change in time t_0 so that the speed is ct_0/t_0= c.

Before answering the second, I have to admit it isn't exactly true! It is an approximation but a very good approximation for small waves. If you were to pull on the string or wire really hard, you might well permanently stretch or even break it!

Imagine a small part of the string between (x_0, y(x_0)) and x_0+ \Delta x, y(x_0+\Delta x)). Let the angle the string makes at x_0 be \theta_{x_0}. With tension, T, the upward force at x_0 is T sin(\theta_{x_0}. Let the angle at x_0+ \Delta x be \theta_{x_0+ \Delta x}. The upward force at x_0+ \Delta x is T sin(\theta_{x_0+ \Delta x} so the net force is T(sin(\theta_{x_0+ \Delta x})- sin(\theta_{x_0})). For small angles sine is approximately tangent so we can approximate that by T(tan(\theta_{x_0+ \Delta x}- tan(\theta_{x_0})).

The tangent of the angle of a curve, at any point, is the derivative with respect to x so can write that as
T(\left[\partial y/\partial x\right]_{x_0+\Delta x}- \left[\partial y/\partial x\right]_{x_0}

If that section of string has length s and density \delta then it has mass \delta \Delta s. For small angles, we can approximate \Delta s by \Delta x. "Mass times acceleration" is
\delta \Delta x \dfrac{\partial y^2}{\partial t^2}
so that "force equals mass times acceration" becomes
T(\left[\partial y/\partial x\right]_{x_0+\Delta x}- \left[\partial y/\partial x\right]_{x_0})= \delta \Delta x \dfrac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}

Dividing both sides by T \Delta x, that becomes
\dfrac{\left[\partial y/\partial x\right]_{x_0+\Delta x}- \left[\partial y/\partial x\right]_{x_0}}{\Delta x}= \dfrac{\delta}{T}\dfrac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}

Now we can recognize that fraction on the left as a "difference quotient" which, in the limit as \Delta x goes to 0, becomes the derivative with respect to x. Since the function in the difference quotient is the first derivative of y with respect to x, the limit gives the second derivative:
\dfrac{\partial^2y}{\partial x^2}= \dfrac{\delta}{T}\dfrac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}

the wave equation with 1/c^2= \delta/T so that c^2= T/\delta.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
amiras said:
The wave on the string could be described with wave equation.

Wave equation has a factor v^2 = Tension/linear density.

It has dimensions of speed, but from where exactly does it follow that this is actually speed of propagation of the wave?

Convince yourself that for an arbitrary function ##f(x)## the function ##y(x, t) = f(x - vt)## solves the wave equation. Then convince yourself that this solution describes a wave whose shape is given by ##f## and which propagates in the positive ##x## direction at a speed ##v##.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top