Wave mechanics : self-adjoint problem

noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The operators P and Q are self-adjoint and satisfy the commutation relation [P,Q]=ic where c is a real number. Show that the operator [P,Q] is anti-self-adjoint, that is , that the adjoint of the operator is the negative of the operator, consistent with the right-hand side of the equation.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know a self-adjoint operator Q*=Q where * represents the dagger. [P,Q]=(PQ-QP)*phi=ic=0=PQphi-QPphi= PQ*phi-Q*Pphi=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you setting [P,Q] equal to zero? and what is 'phi'...an example wavefunction?...There is no need to introduce any wavefunctions here.

By definition, [P,Q]=PQ-QP...you are told that this is equal to ic.

What is the definition of [P,Q]^\dagger?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Why are you setting [P,Q] equal to zero? and what is 'phi'...an example wavefunction?...There is no need to introduce any wavefunctions here.

By definition, [P,Q]=PQ-QP...you are told that this is equal to ic.

What is the definition of [P,Q]^\dagger?

Right... matrices don't commute. By definition , [P,Q]^\dagger=[Q,P]=QP-PQ

I think I got it . PQ=ic+QP => [Q,P]=QP-PQ=QP-(ic+QP)=-ic ?
 
Last edited:
While its true that [P,Q]^{\dagger}=[Q,P] (but only since Q and P are Hermitian), that's not really the definition of [P,Q]^{\dagger}. In fact, it's basically the very thing you are trying to prove, so I wouldn't use it as the basis of your proof!

By definition,

[P,Q]^{\dagger}=(PQ-QP)^{\dagger}=(PQ)^{\dagger}-(QP)^{\dagger}

Now, use the fact that (AB)^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}A^{\dagger} for any two operators A and B, along with the fact that Q and P are Hermitian...
 
gabbagabbahey said:
While its true that [P,Q]^{\dagger}=[Q,P] (but only since Q and P are Hermitian), that's not really the definition of [P,Q]^{\dagger}. In fact, it's basically the very thing you are trying to prove, so I wouldn't use it as the basis of your proof!

By definition,

[P,Q]^{\dagger}=(PQ-QP)^{\dagger}=(PQ)^{\dagger}-(QP)^{\dagger}

Now, use the fact that (AB)^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}A^{\dagger} for any two operators A and B, along with the fact that Q and P are Hermitian...

[P,Q]^{\dagger}=(PQ-QP)^{\dagger}=(PQ)^{\dagger}-(QP)^{\dagger}=Q^{\dagger}P^{\dagger}-P^{\dagger}Q^{\dagger}; since Q^{\dagger}=Q , then P^{\dagger}=P, therefore Q^{\dagger}P^{\dagger}-P^{\dagger}Q^{\dagger}=QP-PQ=[Q,P]

therefore [P,Q]^{\dagger}=[Q,P]
 
Right, but your problem statement doesn't actually tell you the operators are Hermitian, so you won't want to use that.

Instead, just take the adjoint of both sides of the equation you are given...

[P,Q]=ic\implies [P,Q]^{\dagger}=(ic)^{\dagger}=-ic=-[P,Q]
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top