Wave packet propagating in one dimension

krakes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am working on a problem that goes
"Show that for a wave packet propagating in one dimension, for a free particle Hamiltonian"

m d<x^2>/dt = <xp> + <px>

What I think I want to do.

Use
d<A>/dt = i/hbar * <[H,A]>

Which leads me to

d<x^2>/dt = i/hbar * <[H,x^2]>

For the free particle H = p^2/2m

Noting the relationship [x,p] = xp - px = ih => xp = ih + px
note in the below I have not typed the bar behind the h to indicate that it is indeed hbar.
[H,X^2] = [P^2/2m,x^2] for the free particle
[H,X^2] = 1/2m (ppxx - xxpp)
[H,X^2] = 1/2m (ppxx - (x(ih + px)p))
[H,X^2] = 1/2m (ppxx - (ihx + xpxp))
[H,X^2] = 1/2m (ppxx - (ihx + (ih + px)(ih + px))
[H,X^2] = 1/2m (ppxx - (ihx + ihih + 2ihpx + (px)(px))
[H,X^2] = 1/2m (ppxx - (ihx -h^2+ 2ihpx + ppxx)
[H,X^2] = 1/2m (ppxx -ihx +h^2 - 2ihpx - ppxx)
[H,X^2] = 1/2m ( -ihx +h^2 - 2ihpx)
or something like this.

This is where I get stuck, as a matter of fact I am not sure of any of the above is correct, I just tried to follow a similar example that goes

m d<x>/dt = i/hbar <[P^2/2m,x]>
[H,X] = 1/2m (ppx - xpp)
[H,X] = 1/2m (ppx - (ih + px)p)
[H,X] = 1/2m (ppx - (pxp + ihp))
[H,X] = 1/2m (ppx - (p(ih + px) + ihp))
[H,X] = 1/2m (ppx - (ihp + ppx + ihp))
[H,X] = -ihp/m

Any help on this would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the Schroedinger picture

m\frac{d}{dt}\langle \hat{x}^{2} \rangle_{|\psi\rangle} =...= \frac{1}{2i\hbar} \langle \psi|[\hat{x}^{2},\hat{H}]_{-}|\psi\rangle =...= \langle \psi|\hat{x}\hat{p}_{x}+\hat{p}_{x}\hat{x}|\psi\rangle

Daniel.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top