Why Is the Wave Equation Dimensionally Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The wave equation presented, \(\frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial t^2} - \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} = 0\), is dimensionally incorrect, likely due to a mistake in the coursework. It is suggested that the correct form should include \(c\) squared, resulting in \(\frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial t^2} - \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} = 0\). The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring consistency across equations when solving the problem. A hint is provided to substitute \(\Psi(x,t) = a(t) \sin \left( \frac{n \pi x}{L} \right)\) into the corrected wave equation to verify the solution. It is also recommended to inform the instructor about the dimensional error in the coursework.
Sorgen
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
8475095528_158b1789f3_b.jpg


Alright so I'm clueless. I've read the chapter and the concept of a one dimensional box is never mentioned before this problem. I'm thinking i have to integrate some stuff but i have no idea where to begin.

Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry about the box. You could just as well think of it as a vibrating string with the ends fixed.
 
Hello Sorgen,

I'm not sure what kind of class this is for, but if it is a class that does not require knowledge of differential equations as a prerequisite (or is not a differential equations class itself), the desired solution just might be taking one equation and plugging it into the other, and making sure everything is consistent with the third. That's my speculation anyway.

That said, something is awry with the problem statement.

\frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial t^2} - \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} = 0
is not dimensionally correct.

Are you sure it's not a mistake in the coursework, and the c shouldn't be squared, making it something like,

\frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial t^2} - \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} = 0?

[Edit: Hint. Although I phrased that last part as a question, treat it rhetorically. I'm pretty certain that the 1/c should be 1/c2. Use \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial t^2} - \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} = 0 as the wave equation. Plug \Psi(x,t) = a(t) \sin \left( \frac{n \pi x}{L} \right) into that and see what you get, and check that it matches up with the rest of the problem. Also, inform your instructor of the 1/c vs. 1/c2 error.]
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top