WE theorem to evaluate matrix elements

pollo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!

In my work I use the WE theorem to evaluate matrix elements. F being the total spin and m the projection onto the z-axis, I am using:

<JIFm|r_(-q)|J'IF'm'>=(-1)^(F'+m'-m)<Fm1q|F'm'>sqrt(2F+1)sixj(F, F', 1:J',J,I)<J'||r||J>

I have a problem with the (-1)^ part which I suspect to be wrong, but have not been able to find a formula to compare a check. Am quite sure the rest is right. Could somebody help and tell what should be in the exponent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


pollo said:
hi!

In my work i use the we theorem to evaluate matrix elements. F being the total spin and m the projection onto the z-axis, i am using:

<jifm|r_(-q)|j'if'm'>=(-1)^{f'+m'-m}<fm1q|f'm'>\sqrt{2f+1}sixj(f, f', 1:j',j,i)<j'||r||j>

i have a problem with the (-1)^ part which i suspect to be wrong, but have not been able to find a formula to compare a check. Am quite sure the rest is right. Could somebody help and tell what should be in the exponent?

I have the theorem as:

&lt;\tau J M|T_q^{(k)}|\tau&#039; J&#039; M&#039;&gt; = {1 \over {\sqrt{2J+1}}}&lt;\tau J ||T^{(k)}||\tau&#039; J&#039;&gt;&lt;J&#039; k M&#039; q| J M&gt;

where &lt;\tau J ||T^{(k)}||\tau&#039; J&#039;&gt; is the reduced matrix element.

Unfortunately I couldn't make head nor tail of the function you're trying to use. Maybe I'll've been of some help. Either way, this has been here for a couple of days with no reply, so maybe this will help the discussion.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top