Weight and Wheel (Linear and Angular Acceleration)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular speed of a bicycle wheel when a mass is attached and allowed to fall. For part (a), the user derives the angular speed based on energy conservation principles, leading to a formula that incorporates the moment of inertia and radius. In part (b), they question whether the approach remains the same with a different radius, expressing confusion about the dependence on mass and radius. Ultimately, the user resolves their confusion by realizing a notation error with the angular velocity symbol. The thread highlights the complexities of applying physics concepts to rotational motion problems.
tizzful
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Weight and Wheel ! (Linear and Angular Acceleration)

Homework Statement


Consider a bicycle wheel that initially is not rotating. A block of mass is attached to the wheel and is allowed to fall a distance . Assume that the wheel has a moment of inertia, I, about its rotation axis.
A)Consider the case that the string tied to the block is attached to the outside of the wheel, at a radius ,ra. Find the angular speed of the wheel after the block has fallen a distance h, for this case.
b)Consider the case that the string tied to the block is attached to the outside of the wheel, at a radius ,rb. Find the angular speed of the wheel after the block has fallen a distance h, for this case.

Homework Equations



K=1/2mv^2 U=mgh Mechanical energy conserved therefore E=K+U
V=rw
Images attached

The Attempt at a Solution


(a)U1+K1=U2+K2
mgh+0=0+1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2
2mgh=mv^2+Iw^2
2mgh=mv^2+I(V/r)^2
(2mghr^2)/(mr^2+I)=v^2
V=SQRT((2mghr^2)/(mr^2+I))
w=v/r
w=SQRT((2mghr^2)/(mr^2+I))/r

(b) the same? just changing the r values?

I entered that as my answer but it says that it does not depend on the variable m and r but the only way to get rid of them is if the moment of intertia wasn't I.. So now I'm very confused and have no way of figuring out how to cancel them...
Help?
Thank you!:smile:
 

Attachments

  • MRB_ke_a.jpg
    MRB_ke_a.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 939
  • MRB_ke_b.jpg
    MRB_ke_b.jpg
    8.8 KB · Views: 975
Physics news on Phys.org
tizzful said:

Homework Equations



K=1/2mv^2 U=mgh Mechanical energy conserved therefore E=K+U
V=rw
Images attached

The Attempt at a Solution


(a)U1+K1=U2+K2
mgh+0=0+1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2
2mgh=mv^2+Iw^2
2mgh=mv^2+I(V/r)^2
(2mghr^2)/(mr^2+I)=v^2
V=SQRT((2mghr^2)/(mr^2+I))
w=v/r
w=SQRT((2mghr^2)/(mr^2+I))/r
Looks fine to me, but please simplify by canceling that outside r.

(b) the same? just changing the r values?

I entered that as my answer but it says that it does not depend on the variable m and r but the only way to get rid of them is if the moment of intertia wasn't I..
That makes no sense to me. (I assume you've stated the problem completely and that there's no additional information given.)
 
Oh thank you, it just turned out I wasn't using the greek w and so basically got the question wrong! ugh very annoying!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top