Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Weird relation: its graph is the formula

  1. Aug 3, 2007 #1
    I thought this was really odd. I wonder if they found it by accident or were trying to do this...


    Apparently, the graph of this formula is the formula:

    graph of formula:

    the formula:
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 3, 2007 #2
    that's ridiculous
  4. Aug 3, 2007 #3
  5. Aug 3, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    A "graph" is a set of points. A "formula" is a set or symbols. What, exactly, do you mean by "the graph of the formula is the formula"?
  6. Aug 3, 2007 #5
  7. Aug 3, 2007 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    And I will assert again that a picture is not a formula!
    What exactly do you mean?
  8. Aug 3, 2007 #7
    aww comon halls you're being to picky. the graph of the formula/equation/algorithm draws out the formula/equation/algorithm

    whatever amorphous concept we are witness to by looking at that picture and reading the wolfram blurb, it's cool.
  9. Aug 3, 2007 #8
  10. Aug 3, 2007 #9
    Seems like HOI would say that the graph of y=3x+2 is NOT a line because its graph is actually a set of points. In fact, y=3x+2 isn't even a formula because it's not a set of symbols: {y=3x+2} is a formula while y=3x+2 is not.

    It's called abuse of language and it happens all the time.
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2007
  11. Aug 3, 2007 #10
    Anyone for Goedel?
  12. Aug 3, 2007 #11


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    No, I would definitely say that the graph of y= 3x+ 2 is a line. I would object to saying that "3x+ 2 is a line"!

    Saying that {y= 3x+2} is a formula because it is a set of symbols while "y= 3x+ 2" is not- not that's picky!
  13. Aug 3, 2007 #12
  14. Aug 3, 2007 #13
    Since all formulae on these web-pages are composed of pixels- I would definitely have to allow that a picture of a formula is a formula itself.
  15. Aug 3, 2007 #14
    do yall think they found this by accident or were looking for this for some strange reason?
  16. Aug 4, 2007 #15

    Gib Z

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    It definitely wasn't found by accident. How they did it though, I can't tell you, or else I'd have to kill you =]
  17. Aug 4, 2007 #16
    I followed the link on the mathworld page to the entry on self recursion. It's got a good puzzle:

    What is the volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z?
  18. Aug 4, 2007 #17


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    It took me a moment- I'm kinda slow- but yes, that is good.
  19. Aug 4, 2007 #18


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Okay, I finally broke down and looked at all the references- Yes, its weird and I must agree that in this case the graph is the formula!
  20. Aug 4, 2007 #19


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    No phoenixthoth, the formula is interesting but not nearly as weird or mysterious as you may first think. I have to admit when I first saw it today I was pretty "blown away", until I figured out how it works. It's actually nothing more than a recipe for decoding an arbitrary binary bitmap (monochrome, height=17, width=arbitrary). The bitmap is stored in the huge number n. Imagine each vertical column of dots in the bitmap being represented by a 17 digit binary number. Now imagine all of those 17 bit numbers being concatanated into one large binary number. Well that's what "n" is.

    Look closly at the formula. First notice that the whole LHS expression is modulo 2. That just decodes each binary bit to either a "0" ot a "1" (0 if the inequality is false, 1 if it is true). Now look at the 2^(-17 floor(x) ...) part of the expression. Can you see that this is merely shifting the bits in the binary number. The mod(floor(y),17) part is shifting out the bits in each column (that is, as y is varied for a given x) while the 17 floor(x) part is shifting the bits 17 at a time (that is, selecting a different 17 bit column bitmap for each different value of x).

    You see it's actually fairly straight forward once you see how it works. The formula can "draw" any bit map that you can make with a height of 17 pixels and arbitrary width, all by constructing the appropriate number "n".
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2007
  21. Aug 4, 2007 #20
    It would have been easier on me if PF allowed img tags to produce images... Then you wouldn't have had to go through the trouble of clicking a couple links.

    uart: interesting analysis. thanks.

    pizza! um, yeah...
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Weird relation: its graph is the formula