What am I doing wrong in calculating the charge on each capacitor in a circuit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the charge on capacitors in a circuit with a total capacitance of 3 microfarads and a voltage of 30 V, leading to a total charge of 9 x 10^-5 C. The initial misunderstanding arises from the assumption that charge is equally distributed among capacitors in series, which is incorrect; instead, the charge on capacitors in series is the same. It is clarified that the charge on the first capacitor in the series affects the subsequent capacitors, as no current flows through the capacitors themselves. The correct approach involves recognizing that the total charge from the battery is distributed across the capacitors, with the charge on each capacitor being equal. This understanding allows for accurate calculations of the charge on each capacitor in the circuit.
Baou
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


YF-24-15.jpg
Each capacitor is 5 \mu F and V_{ab} = 30 V. I'm trying to find out the charge on each capacitor.


Homework Equations


C = \frac QV
C_{eq} = C_1 + C_2 +... for capacitors in parallel.
C_{eq} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{C_1}+\frac{1}{C_2}+...} for capacitors in series.


The Attempt at a Solution


The first thing I did was calculate the equivalent capacitance for the entire circuit to be 3 microfarads. From here I calculate the total amount of charge to be 9*10^-5 C. Then I consider the circuit with just C_4 and the equivalent capacitance of capacitors 1-3. It's just two capacitors in series, and charge should be equally distributed between capacitors in series, right? So I get C_4 = 4.5 * 10^{-5} C, but this is incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Baou said:

Homework Statement


YF-24-15.jpg
Each capacitor is 5 \mu F and V_{ab} = 30 V. I'm trying to find out the charge on each capacitor.

Homework Equations


C = \frac QV
C_{eq} = C_1 + C_2 +... for capacitors in parallel.
C_{eq} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{C_1}+\frac{1}{C_2}+...} for capacitors in series.

The Attempt at a Solution


The first thing I did was calculate the equivalent capacitance for the entire circuit to be 3 microfarads. From here I calculate the total amount of charge to be 9*10^-5 C. Then I consider the circuit with just C_4 and the equivalent capacitance of capacitors 1-3. It's just two capacitors in series, and charge should be equally distributed between capacitors in series, right? So I get C_4 = 4.5 * 10^{-5} C, but this is incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
Both capacitors in series would have the 9 and not the 4.5. To understand this realize that a capacitor is a break in the circuit. Current (and therefore charge) do not cross over that break. Instead, one plate has charge moving onto it while the other plate has charge moving off of it. The result is each plate gains a charge equal in magnitude and opposite in sign while current flows in the circuit. It is easy to forget after seeing current that no current actually flows through the capacitor.

In the series connection, the total charge drawn from the battery to the capacitor c(1234) must therefore rest on the first plate it comes in contact with. We have C(123) and C(4). Using this logic -- since again there is a break in the circuit -- all of the charge stores from the applied voltage must be on C(123). Where then, you may ask, does C(4) get its charge? I point finger to the C(123)'s bottom plate whose charge leaves it and therefore heads toward C(4)'s top plate. Then, C(4)'s top plate accepts that charge -- which is equal to the charge on C(123)'s top & bottom plate(read: that is, the total charge of 9). Then, C(4)'s bottom plate has charge leave it, creating current until eventually it too has 9.

Remember, for plates that are parallel, charge is shared by them.
 
Last edited:
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation; I managed to figure out the rest with your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top