What Are Forced Oscillations and How Do They Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillation
AI Thread Summary
Forced oscillation occurs when a system, like a swing, is continuously driven by an external force, preventing it from coming to rest due to damping. This concept contrasts with free oscillation, where the system oscillates on its own after an initial push. The discussion highlights that applying force in sync with the system's natural frequency leads to resonance, which requires less energy compared to applying a force that disrupts the natural rhythm. Both resonant and non-resonant driving forces can be considered forced oscillations, but resonance specifically enhances amplitude without needing additional energy. Understanding the relationship between forced oscillation and resonance is crucial for effectively maintaining oscillatory motion.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
please i am not getting what forced oscillation really is?please explain.as far as i understand let's take example of a swing ,if we give force to it initially and leave it ,swing will oscillate all by it's own and eventually will come to rest due to damping but if we give continuous force to it ,without giving it chance to damp or stop ,then this is called forced oscillation.I know only this much about forced oscillation,please explain me the entire concept of forced oscillation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gracy said:
please i am not getting what forced oscillation really is?please explain.as far as i understand let's take example of a swing ,if we give force to it initially and leave it ,swing will oscillate all by it's own and eventually will come to rest due to damping but if we give continuous force to it ,without giving it chance to damp or stop ,then this is called forced oscillation.I know only this much about forced oscillation,please explain me the entire concept of forced oscillation.
You just explained the "entire concept" yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
phinds said:
You just explained the "entire concept" yourself.
really.is this all about forced oscillation?
 
gracy said:
really.is this all about forced oscillation?
I don't understand your question. And your period key is stuck again.
 
phinds said:
And your period key is stuck again.
what you mean by this.i really don't understand.
 
gracy said:
what you mean by this.i really don't understand.
Well, take that "sentence" There is a period instead of a space between the word "this" and the word "I"

Your previous post had a similar period-instead-of-space.

Did you not at one point have a whole post that was full of periods and you told me it was because your period key was stuck? Are you typing periods instead of spaces on purpose? If you are, please stop. It makes your "sentences" confusing.
 
  • Like
Likes Danger
I don't think it was me.By the way can you please help me in my thread standing wave .please look at the last post of mine in that thread and answer if you can.It's my request.
 
how forced oscillation is related with resonance?
 
  • #10
gracy said:
how forced oscillation is related with resonance?
Forced oscillation requires a lot of energy if you are not mating it with resonance. This is very easily understood if you look at pushing a kid on a swing. If you let the natural arc of the swing occur and then add a little at the peak, you don't have to add much at all on each swing to keep the swing going back and forth. On the other hand if you break the natural rhythm by stopping the swing before it reaches the top of its arc, or if you force it to continue beyond where it otherwise would, then in either case, your application of forced oscillation will require much more energy than if you take advantage of the natural swing.
 
  • #11
phinds said:
Forced oscillation requires a lot of energy if you are not mating it with resonance. This is very easily understood if you look at pushing a kid on a swing. If you let the natural arc of the swing occur and then add a little at the peak, you don't have to add much at all on each swing to keep the swing going back and forth. On the other hand if you break the natural rhythm by stopping the swing before it reaches the top of its arc, or if you force it to continue beyond where it otherwise would, then in either case, your application of forced oscillation will require much more energy than if you take advantage of the natural swing.
what is natural frequency of the swing?
 
  • #12
gracy said:
what is natural frequency of the swing?
Do you think that when you push a kid on a swing with just one push and then let go and don't push any more, that it could possibly move at anything OTHER than its natural frequency?
 
  • #13
phinds said:
If you let the natural arc of the swing occur and then add a little at the peak
so are we providing new frequency( which is different than it's natural frequency) to swing?I don't think so ,i think we are giving same frequency as natural frequency of the swing,the only thing which is changing is amplitude of the swing because of resonance.right?
 
  • #14
gracy said:
so are we providing new frequency( which is different than it's natural frequency) to swing?
That is not what I said.

I don't think so ,i think we are giving same frequency as natural frequency of the swing,the only thing which is changing is amplitude of the swing because of resonance.right?
yes, that IS what I said. You are simply reinforcing the amplitude of the natural frequency, otherwise it takes much more energy to do it.
 
  • #15
gracy said:
so are we providing new frequency( which is different than it's natural fauency) to swing?I don't think so ,i think we are giving same frequency as natural frequency of the swing,the only thing which is changing is amplitude of the swing because of resonance.right?
Instead of synchronizing your push inputs with the natural rhythm of the swing-child system, you could grab hold of the chains with both hands and heave backwards and forwards at any fast rate of your own choosing. This is forced oscillation. Just make sure you warn the child in advance so s/he knows to hang on tight!

The novelty of the situation will likely wear off quickly.
 
  • #16
NascentOxygen said:
Instead of synchronizing your push inputs with the natural rhythm of the swing-child system, you could grab hold of the chains with both hands and heave backwards and forwards at any fast rate of your own choosing. This is forced oscillation.
And if we are synchronizing our push inputs with the natural rhythm of the swing-child system i.e giving same frequency as the natural frequency of the swing ,won't it be forced oscillation?
 
  • #17
gracy said:
giving same frequency as the natural frequency of the swing ,
Of course it is resonance ,so my question is resonance need forced oscillation or not?I think forced oscillation can be in both condition
(1)giving same frequency as the natural frequency of the object
(2)imparting new frequency to object
So both are included in forced oscillation but resonance is possible only in first (1)one.
 
  • #18
gracy said:
And if we are synchronizing our push inputs with the natural rhythm of the swing-child system i.e giving same frequency as the natural frequency of the swing ,won't it be forced oscillation?
I wasn't sure, so referred to a few sites. It appears you are right, any periodic input is a forcing function---so results in forced oscillations.
 
Back
Top