What are possible subtopics for a physics extended essay on firearms?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on developing subtopics for an IB extended essay in physics focused on firearms. Two proposed subtopics include analyzing momentum laws related to recoil and terminal ballistics, and exploring gas laws concerning the firing process and sound reduction. A suggested experiment involves using a pendulum to measure the momentum of a bullet, although safety concerns are noted. Participants share personal experiences with similar experiments, emphasizing the potential for accurate results. The conversation also touches on the challenges of sourcing materials and the impact of importation laws on firearm accessories in Canada.
Vodka
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
i'm starting [again] a physics topic for extended essay for IB...my last few topics haven't worked due to technical difficulties [ie: can't complete experiments, lack of avaliable resources, etc] so my new idea for a topic is firearms. the lab can easily be done by going to a shooting range sometime this week.

i'm looking to have at least three comprehensive subthesis', each focusing on a field of physics that is directly relevant. my ideas for two so far are:

momentum laws - primary/secondary recoil, terminal ballistics etc, all with a few relevant equations.

gas laws - actual firing of gun, how it cycles, noise generated and how it could be reduced, might be able to get some relevant figures [ratio of gunpowder grain to gaseous products]

i don't know what to do the last one on..kinematics and sound could be plasuable if i need, but are both sortof weak. so any sortof help would be great. thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vodka, I don't have enough knowledge/ideas about rifles to help
except to dig up from memory an experiment that
a Freshman physics (like 1A or 1B) did years ago in class (!) with a 22.

I guess it was after class had ended.

there was a wooden frame like a sawhorse from which was
suspended a pendulum
and the pendulum bob was a large block of wood of known mass into which the bullet would embed itself on impact

the 22 rifle, IIRC, was clamped in a vise on the experiment bench.

an observer from the side (far enough away for safety)
could see what angle the pendulum swung

the bullet mass was determined
it was fired into the pendulum, which was hanging at rest,

the momentum imparted to the combined mass of wood block and slug
was determined from the angle of swing

the speed of the slug was calculated

perhaps this is a standard procedure
(i mention it only because it is all I got that is remotely
applicable)

BTW this seems potentially dangerous to me because the suspension of the pendulum is critical and the slug must hit dead center to avoid putting a torque on the block.

I'm not recommending this! It is just all I've seen done with firearms in first year college physics.
 
Last edited:
I did a similar experiment, except with an airsoft gun. It was hard to get a correct angle reading, but once I did, i was surprised by the accuracy of the experiment. The gun shot 280 FPS according to the manufacturer. My experiment found the average velocity around 260-270 FPS. Not bad!
 
on a completely tangential point, what gun do you have? ^_^

i got a mk23 socom kit and a tm mp5a4hg. it currently has a navy flashhider, clawmount, guarder 11stage RDS, 2 and 3 pt slings, 2x hicaps, 5x locaps, an ICS triplerail handgrip, mag clamp, large 8.4 3000mah battery in a case. in the process of purchasing a vertical handgrip, and looking into a better flashlight and laser pointer. I've spent so much, its obscene.

i get to spend about twice what you would for the same thing because of the stoopid importation laws in Canada. ah well. least we get trademarks and unpainted barrels
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top