What are some recommended intro physics books for studying electromagnetics?

AI Thread Summary
Recommended introductory physics books for studying electromagnetics include Resnick & Halliday's "Physics," particularly the 3rd edition, which covers Maxwell's Equations in volume 2. E.M. Purcell's "Electricity and Magnetism" is noted for providing a solid foundation, though it is considered more challenging. D.J. Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" is also suggested, but its suitability depends on the reader's current knowledge in mathematics and physics. The discussion highlights the importance of assessing one's background before choosing a textbook. Overall, these resources are valuable for anyone looking to study electromagnetics effectively.
jinyong
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Can someone please recommend a good intro physics book to study electromagnetics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What background knowledge do you have in mathematics and physics?

For freshman physics, there's Resnick & Haliday, Physics (Not Fundamentals of Phyiscs). It covers Maxwell's Equations in their integral form. You'll find lots of threads here on whether these are good books and which edition is best. I like the 3rd edition. E&M is covered in volume 2 of the 3rd edition.

See also

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=147075
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=140455
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=141150
 
Last edited:
Definitely "Electricity and Magnetism" by Prucell. It's a bit tougher than most textbooks, but it gives you a great foundation.
 
That's E.M. Purcell.
Then, there's D.J. Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics".

However, since the OP didn't indicate the OP's current level of preparation, these may not be appropriate at this time.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Physics Exam Preparation: General question about auxiliary quantity and linearization of a function in physics
Replies
27
Views
1K
Physics Book Recommendations for Self-Study at Undergraduate Level?
Replies
12
Views
4K
Studying How to self-study physics past High School Level?
3
Replies
102
Views
5K
Classical A relearning experience - self study edition
Replies
16
Views
5K
Physics learning resources that are not so difficult for me
Replies
12
Views
2K
Solid State Good Condensed Matter Physics Books and Semiconductor Physics Books
Replies
3
Views
4K
Recommendations for study materials to prepare for undergrad Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Astronomy Good Book Recommendations on Solar Physics
Replies
3
Views
3K
Recommended books for a physics undergrad
Replies
2
Views
3K
Intro Math Hassani's books on Mathematical Physics/Methods
Replies
2
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top