What Are the Cartesian Coordinates of a Rotating Pendulum?

Kulkid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

rod.png
[/B]
Find the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) of a fixed reference frame expressed in terms of the coordinates (x', y' , z) of a rotating frame, which rotates with the horizontal rod HR. Choose the x' -axis to point along the horizontal rod in the direction OA.
Use this to find the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) of the pendulum expressed in terms of θ and t

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried this:
##x = x' cos(\omega t)##
##y = y' cos(\omega t)##
##z = z##

##x' = a\hat{i}##
##y' = b sin(\theta)\hat{j}##
##z = -b cos(\theta)\hat{k}##

So: ##\vec{r} = (acos(\omega t), bsin(\theta)cos(\omega t), -bcos(\theta)) ##

Im later supposed to get a Lagrangian that looks like this:
##L =1/2mb^2\dot{\theta^2}+mab\omega cos(\theta)\dot{\theta}+1/2mb^2 \omega^2sin^2(\theta)+mgbcos(\theta)##
but its not quite working. Any tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yout primed x and y coordinates should depend on both unprimed x and y coordinates in order to represent a rotation. If not, your coordinate transformation is singular at ##t = 1/\omega## (and represents a time dependent rescaling, not a rotation).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top