What Are the Correct Euler's Angles for Rotating a Cube?

Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What are the Euler's angles corresponding to the rotations of a cube in \theta radians around each of its principal axes



around the x: \theta=\theta
\phi=\psi=0

around z:\psi=\theta=0
\phi=\theta

around y:\phi=\theta=\theta
\psi=-\theta


is it correct? how can I make it more clear? It's very confusing...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Help me please...
 
In order to formalize the solution you can use the rotation matrices: \hat{R}_x(\alpha), \hat{R}_y(\alpha), \hat{R}_z(\alpha) and the matrix which describes the whole Euler's transform:

<br /> \hat{R}(\theta, \phi, \psi) =<br /> \hat{R}_z(\phi) \hat{R}_x(\theta) \hat{R}_z(\psi) \quad (1)<br />

It's easy to get rotation around the x and z axes from (1) and your answers for these cases are right.

As for y-axis the condition

<br /> \hat{R}(\theta, \phi, \psi) = \hat{R}_y(\alpha)<br />

yields

<br /> \theta = -\frac{\pi}{2} - \alpha;<br />

<br /> \phi = \psi = -\frac{\pi}{2}.<br />
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top