What are the forces and displacement involved in this body's movement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the motion of a 2.3 kg body under a force defined by Fx = -3x N. The user successfully determined the velocity at x = 3.6 m as 10.73 m/s but struggled with finding the position where the velocity is 3.0 m/s. Participants noted that the force is not constant and is proportional to displacement, indicating negative acceleration. The conversation highlighted the importance of using calculus and integrating to solve the problem, leading to a proposed solution of x = 9.7 m. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of non-constant forces in motion analysis.
nabilsaleh
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The only force acting on a 2.3 kg body as it moves along the positive x-axis has an x component Fx = -3x N, where x is in meters. The velocity of the body at x = 2.8 m is 11 m/s. (a) What is the velocity of the body at x = 3.6 m? (b) At what positive value of x will the body have a velocity of 3.0 m/s?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i got the answer for part A (10.73m/s) but I'm stuck in B! HELP!

i tried vf^2=vi^2 +2Ax for part a. But i just don't know wat to substitute in B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not a constant force, so the equation vf^2=vi^2 +2Ax is not valid. What motion is it when the force is proportional to the displacement and opposite to it?

ehild
 
ehild said:
What motion is it when the force is proportional to the displacement and opposite to it?

ehild

negative acceleration, right?
 
And what is the sign of the acceleration when x is negative?

ehild
 
ehild said:
And what is the sign of the acceleration when x is negative?

ehild

positive...so?
 
The acceleration is not constant. Is the force conservative?

ehild
 
ehild said:
The acceleration is not constant. Is the force conservative?

ehild

no the force is not conservative. so do we use f=ma? but in that case wat is a ?!
 
a=F/m. And how do you know that this force is not conservative?

ehild
 
ehild said:
a=F/m. And how do you know that this force is not conservative?

ehild


obviously the force changes according to displacement. but how could a=f/m benefit us? i didn't get where you're trying to get with this...
 
  • #10
Have you learned calculus? Or have you learned about simple harmonic motion?

ehild
 
  • #11
ehild said:
Have you learned calculus? Or have you learned about simple harmonic motion?

ehild

i did. but can you elaborate please. I am having a hard time following you here :S
 
  • #12
ehild said:
Have you learned calculus? Or have you learned about simple harmonic motion?

ehild

i tried integrating (w= (integral) fd )
and i got x=9.7

PLEASE CHECK MY ANSWER! this is important!
 
  • #13
nabilsaleh said:
i tried integrating (w= (integral) fd )
and i got x=9.7

PLEASE CHECK MY ANSWER! this is important!

The result is all right. But you get proper help earlier if you show your work in detail.

ehild
 
Back
Top