What Are the Limitations of Bohr's Atom Model in Electron Distribution?

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



revered members,
one limitation of bohr atom model is that it could not account for distribution and arrangement of electrons. i could not understand this statement, that is, according to bohr , electrons revolve around the nucleus in circular orbits and the necessary centripetal force is provided by the electrostatic force of attraction between the nucleus and the electron. so, electrons are situated around the nucleus. THEN HOW CAN WE SAY THAT HE COULD NOT ACCOUNT FOR DISTRIBUTION AND ARRANGEMENT OF electrons? does electrons in circular orbits around nucleus not mean distribution and arrangement? please help..

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what particular observations they're referring to, but clearly electrons don't orbit in perfect circles, so the bohr model wouldn't account for their true distributions---i suppose that's what they're referring to. Also the bohr model isn't fully self-consistent...

Anyway, I don't think the particular wording here is important, the overall message is that the bohr model, while useful, is wrong in the end.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top