A What are the possible radii for free falling motion in a rocket trip?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
I have this exercise which I don't understand its solution.

I am attaching both the exercise and its solution.

It's problem 2: rocket trip.
What I don't understand in the solution they write that:
"and from this you get:
$$\omega < \frac{1}{R}\sqrt{1-2m/R}$$
Then plug in ##\omega = m/R^3## to obtain the possible radii for free falling motion,
$$R>3m$$

Now, if I plug in this ##\omega## I get: ##m/R^2<\sqrt{1-2m/R}## and squaring both sides and multiplying by R^4 I get: ##m^2<R^4-2mR^3## ; if ##R>3m## then ##R^4-2mR^3>27m^4## and this is greater than ##m^2## whenever ##m^2>1/27##; from what does this follow I don't see, can't ##m^2## be less than ##1/27##?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
MathematicalPhysicist said:
plug in ##\omega = m/R^3##

The solution appears to be wrong here. The correct equation you should get from the geodesic equation and the Christoffel symbols is ##\omega^2 = m / R^3## (note the squared ##\omega##), which you should recognize as Kepler's Third Law (note that this law turns out to hold exactly even in the relativistic case for this particular problem). This gives ##\omega = \sqrt{m / R^3}##; if you plug that into the other equation you should get ##R > 3m##, as expected.
 
  • Like
Likes MathematicalPhysicist
Btw, please note that it's highly preferred to post equations directly in LaTeX instead of attaching PDFs. I can understand not wanting to have to copy the entire problem and solution in, but just including a couple of the other equations would have been helpful (and in fact might have helped you to answer your own question).

Also, is this problem and solution available online? If so, links are better than PDFs.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top