What Are the Probable Values of Energy and Momentum for a Free Particle at t=0?

nikolafmf
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At time t=0 free particle is found in state psi=const*sin(3x)*exp[i(5y+z)]. What values for energy and for momentum we can get if we measure them at t=0 and with what probability?


Homework Equations


Well, we know that eigenvalues of energy and momentum operator for free particle are (hbar*k)^2/(2m) and hbar*k respectively.



The Attempt at a Solution


So, does measured momentum equal hbar*(0, 5, 1) and energy 13(hbar)^2/m? Is probability 100%? Book hints that we can get different values for momentum, not just one I stated before. How is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got the y and z momentum correct. But You've not got the correct x momentum. In the wavefunction, the bit that depends on x is: sin(3x) So you've got to think of how to express this in terms of eigenstates.
 
With the use of Fourier transform? But if my limits of integration are infinity, I get diverging integrals. What limits should I use?
 
you don't need to do anything complicated. I'm sure you must have learned about how to write a sine function as a sum of two complex exponentials... (that's the hint)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top