What Are the Surface Charge Densities on a Conducting Slab in an Electric Field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter heartofaragorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Infinite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the surface charge densities on the faces of a conducting slab situated in an electric field created by an infinite sheet of charge. The slab has a net charge density of 5 microC/m^2, while the sheet has a charge density of -3 microC/m^2. Participants note that the electric field inside the conductor is zero, leading to the conclusion that one face must have a negative charge and the other a positive charge. Attempts to use the formula E = density / permittivity of free space have led to confusion, with some participants struggling to arrive at the correct surface charge densities. Clarification on the relationship between the charges on the slab's surfaces is sought to resolve the discrepancies in calculations.
heartofaragorn
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An infinite sheet of charge, oriented perpendicular to the x-axis, passes through x = 0. It has area density = -3 micro C/m^2. A thick, infinite conducting slab, also oriented perpendicular to the x-axis, occupies the region between x=a and x=b where a = 4 cm and b=5 cm. The conducting slab has a net charge per unit area = 5 microC/m^2. Calulate the surface charge densities on the left hand and right had faces of the conducting slab. You may also find it useful to note the relationship between them.

Homework Equations


E = density / permittivity of free space (epsilon o)
?


The Attempt at a Solution


According to my physics book, since the inside of the conductor has an electric field of zero, one can assume that the charge on the surfaces are negative and positive. I reasoned that the negative charge would like closer to the y-axis whereas the positive charge would lie on the other side. I tried using the formula above, but I'm guessing it is the wrong formula since I cannot get the correct answer this way. I also tried answers such as -3 micro C and +8 micro C to balance out the total charge of 5 micro C. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help if I attached the picture! :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • Sheets.gif
    Sheets.gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 628
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top