What are the torque-producing forces in this system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter klandestine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the torque-producing forces in a system involving a beam and a professor standing on it. The beam, which is uniform and 5.00 meters long, has a weight w_b, while the professor has a weight w_p and stands 2.00 meters from the pivot point. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing a free body diagram to identify the forces acting on the beam, including the weights, tension in the string, and forces at the pivot. They suggest treating the professor and beam as a single system to simplify the analysis and derive equations for rotational equilibrium. The conversation concludes with a focus on writing the equation for rotational equilibrium to solve for the tension in the string.
klandestine
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I've attached a picture of the problem I am referring to.

The pulley is placed so that the string makes a 45.0-degree angle with the beam. The beam is uniform, 5.00 meters long, and has weight w_{b}. The professor stands 2.00 meters from the pivot point and has weight w_{p}.

First, I am asked to find the tension in the string (in terms of w_{b} and w_{p}).

I started off by drawing a free body diagram. At the center of mass (which I found to be (\frac{5}{2}w_{b}+2w_{p})/(w_{b}+w_{p}), I have a force downward equal to w_{b}+w_{p}.
I also labeled both sections of the string as T (the first T vector is pointing straight up, and the second is pointing northwest)
I am unsure about these, but I suppose there is a normal force coming from the wall (horizontal) as well as a force of static friction pointing up.

Also, I am assuming that the pivot point is the point where the beam touches the wall.

So far, do I have the right idea?
 

Attachments

  • eccentricprofessor.jpg
    eccentricprofessor.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 442
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry about center of mass. Draw a free body diagram of the beam. Presume that there is a vertical and horizontal force at the pivot point (there is a vertical force, but horizontal will turn out to be zero). Just better to have both if you're unsure.

Be careful about the forces acting on the beam. Where the professor is standing, I'd just put a force Fm (force of man on beam).

So the forces acting on the beam should be, the two forces at the pivot point, the weight of the beam, the force Fm, and the force T (tension) at the end of the beam.

Do you see a way to get a relationship between Fm and T (with no other unknowns in the equation)? One equation will do it.

Now you need a second equation relating Fm and T. Can you see how to get it? You may have to use a second free body diagram.

You have 2 equations with 2 unknowns, and you can solve for T.
 
You can draw the free body diagram of the professor-beam system. (treat the professor and beam as one body). I believe this is what you were doing. This is better than what I posted above. I don't know why I wanted to treat the professor and beam separately.

You don't need the center of mass. (you can calculate it if you wish to).

Make sure you draw all the forces acting on the beam and the professor.

One equation will let you immediately solve for T using this method.
 
Would this equation be the net torque of the system (which equals zero)?
 
here are my forces:
where the beam meets the wall - friction (up) normal (right)
on the beam I have Wp and Wb pointing down and the normal force of the professor pointing up
on the far right, I have the tension which has a both an up (T_y) and a left (T_x) pointing component.

But I feel odd about the forces that I attribute to the professor because I feel like him being attached to the pulley should lessen his weight and normal force.
 
klandestine said:
here are my forces:
where the beam meets the wall - friction (up) normal (right)
It looks to me that the beam is attached to the wall. So the force that the wall exerts is not friction. But, no matter; if you are wise you will use the beam/wall interface as your pivot, so that force will exert no torque.

on the beam I have Wp and Wb pointing down and the normal force of the professor pointing up
on the far right, I have the tension which has a both an up (T_y) and a left (T_x) pointing component.
I would treat the professor plus beam as a single system. Using the left end of the beam as the pivot, the torque-producing forces are:
weight of the professor
weight of the beam
tension (T) pulling up on the professor
tension (T) pulling on the end of the beam (at an angle)​
Now just write the equation for rotational equilibrium.

(I'm saying just what learningphysics said in his last post.)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top