What Causes Discrepancies in Calculating Induced Charge Ratios?

Mohammad Allahham
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear colleagues
I have this problem which I don't understand from where they got the solution I tried to solve it with slot of methods with the same answer which not the stated answer.
A point charge (q) is located a distance (b) from a grounded conducting sphere with radius (a) show that the ratio between the induced charge of the part in the front of (q) to the rest part is
√(a+b)/√(b-a)
I tried a lot of but each time I got the following answer
√(b2 - a2 +2ab)/√(b2 - a2 - 2ab)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mohammad Allahham said:
Dear colleagues
I have this problem which I don't understand from where they got the solution I tried to solve it with slot of methods with the same answer which not the stated answer.
A point charge (q) is located a distance (b) from a grounded conducting sphere with radius (a) show that the ratio between the induced charge of the part in the front of (q) to the rest part is
√(a+b)/√(b-a)
I tried a lot of but each time I got the following answer
√(b2 - a2 +2ab)/√(b2 - a2 - 2ab)
Welcome to the PF.

Please show us a diagram of the problem, and show us all of your work that got you to that answer. We can only help you if you show us all of your work.

And in future schoolwork threads that you start, please fill out the Homework Help Template that you are provided when posting. It helps to organize your post, so we don't have to ask so many questions before being able to help. Thank you.

Template said:

Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Mohammad Allahham said:
each time I got the following answer
Looks like you are getting the wrong sign on the a2 term, but as noted above, we can't guess how without seeing your working.
Note that your answer makes no sense as b tends to a. You might be able to make that test at various points in your working to see where it goes wrong.

I assume is b the distance from the surface (outside).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top