What causes the change in velocity from pole to equator on Earth?

AI Thread Summary
The change in velocity from the pole to the equator is due to the Earth's rotation, which results in zero tangential velocity at the pole and a significant velocity of 1,670 kph at the equator. As a person moves from the pole to the equator, they experience an increase in velocity because the ground beneath them is rotating faster. This acceleration is influenced by the Coriolis force and the relative motion of the air, which also moves at high speeds at the equator. Each step taken southward results in landing on increasingly faster-moving ground, cumulatively leading to the high velocity at the equator. Understanding these dynamics clarifies how rotational motion affects velocity across different latitudes.
papernuke
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Assume there's a person standing at the pole of the earth. When the Earth rotates, he/she has no tangential velocity because the person is at the pole.
Now if the person were to take a trip by plane and land at the equator, the person would now have a fairly large velocity because the equator's tangential velocity is quite high.
What provides the acceleration that that changes the person's velocity from zero at the pole to 1,670 kph at the equator?


source for 1,670: http://geography.about.com/library/faq/blqzEarth'spin.htm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why the Earth does - and the engines in the means of transportation.

Consider, you are in free fall above an airless spherical World composed entirely of ice and you are wearing ice-skates.
The world is turning below you. The ground gets closer - your feet touch the ground - the world keeps turning under you.

From your POV, you are now skating very fast across the surface.
Turn your skates and you can slide to a "stop" - now you are going at the same speed as the surface under you ... where did the acceleration come from?
 
Last edited:
papernuke said:
Assume there's a person standing at the pole of the earth. When the Earth rotates, he/she has no tangential velocity because the person is at the pole.
Now if the person were to take a trip by plane and land at the equator, the person would now have a fairly large velocity because the equator's tangential velocity is quite high.
What provides the acceleration that that changes the person's velocity from zero at the pole to 1,670 kph at the equator?source for 1,670: http://geography.about.com/library/faq/blqzEarth'spin.htm

If we ignore variation from the local wind and weather on the surface of the earth, the air at the equator is moving at 1670 kph relative to the air at the north pole. So as the airplane flies southwards, it experiences a sidewind blowing from the west that accelerates it in an eastwards direction.

If you were walking south from the north pole, with every single step you'd be putting your foot down on a patch of Earth that is moving ever so slightly faster to the east than where your foot had been. It's not much at each step, but it's enough to add up to 1670 kph over the 20,000,000 or so steps between pole and equator.

You might want to google for "Coriolis force".
 
Last edited:
Thank you both for the explanations!
I understand it now
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top