What Defines the Maximum Frequency in Damped Driven Oscillations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation (w_max)^2 = (w_0)^2 - (1/2)y^2, which relates to forced vibrations in damped driven oscillations. Participants clarify that w_max represents the exact resonance frequency, while w_0 is the classical resonance frequency without damping. The variable y is identified as the damping constant divided by the mass of the oscillator. The equation is linked to maximum amplitude in resonance scenarios and is applicable to various linear oscillators. The derivation of this expression is based on the second-order ordinary differential equation for damped, driven oscillators.
Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
I am looking at forced vibrations and I have come across this:

(w_max)^2 = (w_0)^2 - (1/2)y^2

Now I am not entirely sure of what the (w_max) is. ANd where does this equation come from? It was simply stated without a derivation.

THanks guys!:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is simply a blank page with that formula on it?

Surely there is some sort of context. As you write it I not only do not know what w_max is, I also don't know what w_0 is or what y is!
 
W_O is the natural/resonance frequency for the system being driven by a force with frequency w.

y is the width, or the damping constant divided by the mass of the oscillator.

The equation comes up in resonance. I think it has to do with the maximum amplitude of the system ?
 
That expression comes up a lot in damped driven oscillations- not just masses and springs, but any sort of linear oscillator.

W_max is the exact resonance frequency, w_0 is the "classical resonance frequency" (i.e. the resonance without damping present).

This expression is strightforward to derive beginning with the 2nd order ODE for a damped, driven oscillator.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator

(about half-way down)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top