What Determines Rebound Height in a Physics Lab Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics lab experiment measuring the rebound height of a ball dropped from various heights. A linear model, y = 0.75x + 2 cm, was created to predict rebound height based on drop height, but it raises questions about its validity, particularly when predicting rebound height from a drop height of zero cm. The model suggests that rebound height would be 2 cm even if the ball is not dropped, which contradicts the principle that rebound height cannot exceed drop height. It is concluded that the model is only accurate for drop heights of 8 cm or more, indicating that a linear model may not be suitable for this scenario. Additionally, concerns about measurement accuracy and methodology are raised, particularly regarding how the heights were measured.
ludi_srbin
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
In Friday we did simple lab in Physics. We took ball and dropped it measuring dropping height and rebound height. We did 10 trials and 10 times for every trial. We started from 100 cm and went all the way to 10 cm. Then we made a model y =0.75x+2 cm. Where x is dropping height in cm and y is rebound height, also, in cm. We could use this model to predict rebound height from any height. Well the accuracy wasn't really the priority. My question is if I "drop" the ball from height of zero cm I would get reboung height 2 cm, according to my model. How can that be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, in fact, since the ball never has the rebound height that's greater than the height it was dropped from. So:
\frac{3}{4}x + 2 \leq x \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{4}x \geq 2 \Leftrightarrow x \geq 8
For any x < 8, it will return a false value.
So the formula can be true for x >= 8 cm. And that's why the smallest height in your work is 10cm, not 0 cm.
Viet Dao,
 
Apparantly either a linear model is no good for this situation, or your measurements were too imprecise or inaccurate.
 
Up to which point did you measure the heights of the ball? It's bottom, middle or top?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top