What Determines the Maximum Height of a Self-Supporting Column?

AI Thread Summary
The maximum height of a self-supporting column is determined by its critical buckling height, which is influenced by material properties and the slenderness ratio, rather than the cross-sectional area. The slenderness ratio indicates how susceptible a column is to buckling, with higher ratios leading to increased instability. Using Euler's buckling formula, the critical height for steel is calculated to be approximately 157.9 meters, while for granite, it is about 39.5 meters. These calculations assume a square cross-section and fixed ends for the columns. Understanding these principles is essential for engineering applications involving vertical columns.
Jacob87411
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
There is a maximum height of a uniform vertical column made of any material that can support itself without buckling, and it is independent of the cross sectional area (why?). Calculate this height for a) steel (density 7.8x10^3) b) Granite (density 2.7x10^3)

I'm just really confused on how to even start this, what equation to use. I am guessing it has something to do with compressive strength but not sure at all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jacob87411 said:
There is a maximum height of a uniform vertical column made of any material that can support itself without buckling, and it is independent of the cross sectional area (why?).
A material has a maximum compressive strength expressed as a force /unit area or pressure. What is the the force/unit area at the base of a column of material of uniform cross-section with density \rho? Is it related to anything other than the height?

Calculate this height for a) steel (density 7.8x10^3) b) Granite (density 2.7x10^3)[/QUOTE] Find the pressure at the base of a column of steel of height h and set the pressure to the yield pressure for steel (compressive strength). What is h? Do the same for granite.

AM
 


The maximum height of a uniform vertical column is determined by its ability to resist buckling, which is a form of instability where the column fails under compressive forces. This maximum height is known as the critical buckling height and it is independent of the cross-sectional area because it is primarily influenced by the material properties and the column's slenderness ratio.

The slenderness ratio is the ratio of a column's length to its cross-sectional dimension and it plays a crucial role in determining the critical buckling height. As the slenderness ratio increases, the column becomes more susceptible to buckling.

To calculate the critical buckling height for a given material, we can use the Euler's buckling formula:

H = (π²EI)/(KL)²

Where:
H = critical buckling height
E = Young's modulus of the material
I = moment of inertia of the cross section
K = effective length factor
L = length of the column

For a) steel:
Given density = 7.8x10^3
Young's modulus of steel is approximately 200 GPa (2x10^11 Pa)
Assuming a square cross section with side length of 1 m, the moment of inertia (I) = (1/12)(1m)^4 = 1/12 m^4
The effective length factor (K) for a fixed-fixed column is 0.5 (assuming both ends are fixed)
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
H = (π² x 2x10^11 x 1/12 m^4)/(0.5 x 1m)² = 157.9 m

For b) granite:
Given density = 2.7x10^3
Young's modulus of granite is approximately 50 GPa (5x10^10 Pa)
Assuming a square cross section with side length of 1 m, the moment of inertia (I) = (1/12)(1m)^4 = 1/12 m^4
The effective length factor (K) for a fixed-fixed column is 0.5 (assuming both ends are fixed)
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
H = (π² x 5x10^10 x 1/12 m^4)/(0.5 x 1m)² = 39.5 m

In summary, the maximum height of
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top