What Determines the Speed of the Second Puck After a Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tabe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a second hockey puck after a collision involving two equal mass pucks. A .50 kg puck moving at 5.70 m/s collides with a stationary puck, with the first puck deflecting at a 60-degree angle and the second puck moving at a right angle. To solve for the speed of the second puck, it is essential to use the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy principles. Participants suggest creating a diagram to visualize momentum vectors and choosing a coordinate system centered at the collision point. The final speed can be determined by calculating the components of momentum and applying the Pythagorean theorem.
Tabe
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Okay, here's the problem I'm working on...
A .50 kg hockey puck moving at a speed of 5.70 m/s collides with a stationary hockey puck of equal mass. After the collisions, the first puck moves off in a direction 60 degrees to the left of its original direction, while the second puck moves off at a right angle to the first puck. What is the speed of the second puck after the collision?
I know that I have to solve for the components, but I'm not sure which numbers to use to solve for it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmh... These are the "numbers":

initial horizontal momentum = (0.50 kg)(5.70)

initial vertical momentum = 0.
 
1)Make a diagram of the particles which collide in which put the momentum vectors.Be careful with the angles.
2)Chose a coordinate system with the center in the collision point and 2 orthonorlmal axis.
3)Write down the conservation of momentum in vector form and conservation of KE.
4) Project the vector eq.written at 3) on the axis of coordinates.
5)Find the "speed of the second puck after the collision".Actually from 4) u find its components on the 2 axis of coordinates.Apply Pythagora's theorem to find the modulus.

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top