What did I do wrong? (Newton's Second Law)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving Newton's Second Law, specifically analyzing the motion of a ball on a decline. The scenario includes a ball with a weight of 500N on a 24° incline, starting with an initial speed and accelerating to a final speed over a specified distance. The goal is to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction and the applied force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate mass, acceleration, and friction using various equations but questions the reasonableness of the calculated acceleration value. Other participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the approach and suggest there may be additional errors.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted that the problem may be self-created, which could introduce unique challenges or assumptions that need to be clarified. There is also a lack of consensus on the correctness of the calculations presented.

glenohumeral13
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(This is a problem I made up, so if the problem is with the problem, let me know.)
A 500N ball is being pushed down a carpeted decline of 24° to the horizontal. It starts from 1 m/s and ends the 20 foot (6.1 m) decline at 32 m/s. What is the coefficient and force of kinetic friction and applied force?

Homework Equations


I used:
Fg = mag, F = ma, a = μkg, and vi = √(vf2 - (2ad)).

The Attempt at a Solution


Fg = mag
50N = m(9.81)
m = 5kg
vi = √(vf2 - (2ad))
1 = √(322 - 2a(6.1))
1 = √(1024 - 12.2a)
1 = √(1011.8a)
1 = 38√(a)
1/38 = √(a)
.022 = a
a = .0004 m/s2
F = ma
F = 5*.0004
F = .002N
a = μkg
.0004 = μk(9.81)
μk = .000040775
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does that value for "a" seem reasonable to you?

I know the equation as...

vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

2ad = vf2 - vi2

a = (vf2 - vi2)/2d

a = (1024 - 1) / (2*6.1)
= 84m/s2
 
PS: It may not be your only error. I haven't checked.
 
CWatters said:
Does that value for "a" seem reasonable to you?

I know the equation as...

vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

2ad = vf2 - vi2

a = (vf2 - vi2)/2d

a = (1024 - 1) / (2*6.1)
= 84m/s2
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K