What did I do wrong? (Newton's Second Law)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a 500N ball on a 24° decline, where the ball accelerates from 1 m/s to 32 m/s over a distance of 6.1 m. The user attempts to calculate the coefficient and force of kinetic friction, using equations related to Newton's Second Law. However, the calculated acceleration appears unreasonably low at 0.0004 m/s², leading to an implausibly small coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.000040775. The user seeks feedback on the accuracy of their calculations and the reasonableness of their results. The overall inquiry highlights potential errors in the application of the equations and assumptions made in the problem-solving process.
glenohumeral13
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(This is a problem I made up, so if the problem is with the problem, let me know.)
A 500N ball is being pushed down a carpeted decline of 24° to the horizontal. It starts from 1 m/s and ends the 20 foot (6.1 m) decline at 32 m/s. What is the coefficient and force of kinetic friction and applied force?

Homework Equations


I used:
Fg = mag, F = ma, a = μkg, and vi = √(vf2 - (2ad)).

The Attempt at a Solution


Fg = mag
50N = m(9.81)
m = 5kg
vi = √(vf2 - (2ad))
1 = √(322 - 2a(6.1))
1 = √(1024 - 12.2a)
1 = √(1011.8a)
1 = 38√(a)
1/38 = √(a)
.022 = a
a = .0004 m/s2
F = ma
F = 5*.0004
F = .002N
a = μkg
.0004 = μk(9.81)
μk = .000040775
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does that value for "a" seem reasonable to you?

I know the equation as...

vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

2ad = vf2 - vi2

a = (vf2 - vi2)/2d

a = (1024 - 1) / (2*6.1)
= 84m/s2
 
PS: It may not be your only error. I haven't checked.
 
CWatters said:
Does that value for "a" seem reasonable to you?

I know the equation as...

vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

2ad = vf2 - vi2

a = (vf2 - vi2)/2d

a = (1024 - 1) / (2*6.1)
= 84m/s2
Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top