What direction will a man appear to be rowing in relative motion?

AI Thread Summary
A man rowing at 2.5 m/s in still water against a 1.5 m/s current should row at an angle of 53.1 degrees upstream. Observers on land will see the boat moving at an angle that combines both the rowing speed and the river current, resulting in a motion that is not strictly perpendicular to the banks. An observer on the boat will perceive their motion as directed upstream, while a stationary observer on the bank will see the boat crossing the river at a diagonal. The observed velocity of the boat is a vector sum of its rowing speed and the river's current. Ultimately, the motion appears different depending on the observer's frame of reference, with the resultant velocity being perpendicular to the riverbanks.
medwatt
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hello,
If a man how is able to row on still water at 2.5m/s. If the water is moving at 1.5m/s, in which direction should he row.
The answer is he should row at 53.1 degrees upstream but the question for an observer on the boat and another observer on land, how will the motion appear?
For an observer on land will the man appear to be rowing along a perpendicular to both river banks ?? Or is it for an observer flowing smoothly with the river current ??
Hence I would like to know how is motion will look like from three different points, from the land, from the water and from the boat !
Thanks !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The observer co-flowing with the stream and the observer on the land will be observing the motion of the boat, that is clear.

But what is the observer on the boat going to observe?
 
The thing that is bothering me is with respect to an observer flowing with the river due east it will appear that the boat will be going vertically upstream. Of course the observer on the boat knows where he is going (2.5m/s at 53.1 degrees upstream. My question is on the ground/bank, what will a stationary observer see ? Surely he can't see either of the two cases mentioned above ??
 
medwatt said:
The thing that is bothering me is with respect to an observer flowing with the river due east it will appear that the boat will be going vertically upstream. Of course the observer on the boat knows where he is going (2.5m/s at 53.1 degrees upstream. My question is on the ground/bank, what will a stationary observer see ? Surely he can't see either of the two cases mentioned above ??

The co-flowing observer cannot just see that the boat is going strictly against the stream. In the end, the boat DOES cross the river, and that will be seen by any observer.

In any case, the observed velocity of the boat is its velocity in the co-flowing frame of reference plus (vector plus!) the velocity of the co-flowing frame relative to whatever frame the other observer is in.
 
But if you draw a vector diagram the resultant of the boat and the river current, you will notice that the river current and the relative velocity vector are perpendicular !
 
The relative velocity is not perpendicular. It is at 53.1 degrees. The resultant velocity is perpendicular.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top