What does mg(theta) means in the equation of motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation of motion for an inverted pendulum attached to a cart, specifically questioning the term mg(theta) in the equation. The user is confused about why sine or cosine functions are not used with theta in this context. It is clarified that since the problem refers to a "small neighborhood of the equilibrium," small angle approximations can be applied, allowing sin(theta) to be approximated as theta. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the assumptions in the problem, such as the application of the least-action principle. Overall, the discussion highlights the relevance of small angle approximations in simplifying the equations of motion for pendulums.
Aerodfocker
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In the case of inverted pendulum attached in a cart with external force U on it,

the equation of motion is like
U - mg(theta1) - mg(theta2) = m*dv/dt

I don't really understand the mg*theta part what does it mean ...should not be sine or cosine fn there with theta ?

can anyone give me some insight on this
thanks in advance ...really appreciate it.

p.s. I HAVE ATTACHED THE FULL QUESTION HERE AS WELL
 

Attachments

  • 2.6 pendulum.png
    2.6 pendulum.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 536
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just the equations of motion for the cart and the two pendulums. If you want to get more information you need to provide us with some first. E.g., we have to know what you are supposed to assume (e.g., are you supposed to use the least-action principle). Also it looks pretty much like a homework problem, which you should post in the corresponding subforum!
 
  • Like
Likes Aerodfocker
Aerodfocker said:
should not be sine or cosine fn there with theta ?

The problem statement says "small neighborhood of the equilibrium" which means the θ's are small so you can use approximations like sin θ ≅ θ.
 
  • Like
Likes Aerodfocker
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top