What Factors Influence the Equation for a Bouncing Ball's Range?

  • Thread starter Thread starter keishuu
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To derive a general equation for the range of a bouncing ball, factors such as the coefficient of restitution, initial drop height, and the angle of impact should be considered. The discussion emphasizes the need for a theoretical approach rather than relying solely on software tools like Excel for curve fitting. Suggestions include analyzing the relationship between drop height and bounce distance through experimental data. The user seeks guidance on formulating a mathematical model based on their collected data. Overall, the focus is on creating an accurate equation that reflects the physics of bouncing balls.
keishuu
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was wondering if someone could aid me in finding a general equation for this data. In my physics lab we had to drop a small steel ball over a steel bounce plate and record the range from the base of the bounce plate that it went. This was done 18 times from several heights and then averaged. I know I need to take into account the coefficient of restitution, what else should I take account of and do you have any suggestions about how to get a good equation going through this data.
Any suggestions? Thanks

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've included a graph of the data below
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
If I recall correctly, MS Excel does have a "fit polynomial to curve" function, after you sketch a graph of the data you have. You can even choose the value of the highest order polynomial you want to approximate your curve with.
 
I have to determine this using theory not using excel. Can someone please help me?
 
Here is a better description of the problem
 

Attachments

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top