Relativity What Graduate-Level Physics Topics Should You Explore After Calculus?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student who has completed their first year of calculus and physics courses and is seeking to advance their knowledge in graduate-level topics related to their interests in stellar evolution, nuclear physics, and relativity. They express a desire for in-depth learning rather than popular science books, specifically looking for resources that include calculations. Recommendations include progressing to Calculus 2, which opens up further study opportunities, followed by linear algebra, which requires a certain level of mathematical maturity. Additionally, they are advised to study "Intro Mechanics" by Kleppner and Kolenkow as a preparatory step before tackling Griffiths' "Electromagnetism." The focus remains on building a strong mathematical foundation to support their interests in advanced physics topics.
Caglar Yildiz
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I am done with the first year calculus and physics courses and I think maybe I should be going on one subject to improve in that field. What actually is in my mind is I want to learn about a subject in graduate level then go on on this topic in my physics career. I am interested in the evolution of stars and also nuclear physics how the elements are formed etc. Also relativity which is why I study physics actually :D anyway if there are books that i can go through but not like a popular science books i want to learn the calculations.. Thanks for replies :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For addition my most interest is relativity and particle physics
 
I am undergraduate (correction)
 
Learn calculus 2 and a world of possibilities opens up. After calculus 2 you can study linear algebra (you meet the prerequisites, however the theory behind it requires mathematical maturity). After learning calculus 2. You can work out of kleppner and kolenkow Intro Mechanics, in preparation for Griffiths EnM.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top