What happens if you only get 1 solution to a 2nd Order Diff EQ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Diff eq
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, I'm slightly confused on this problem, when i factored it and solved for r, i came out with only 1 answer, r = -13/72
Here is my problem and work:
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/685/lastscan15uk.jpg

:biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you get repeated roots in your auxilary equation, e.g.

y^{\prime\prime}-2y^{\prime}+1=0

has the auxilary equation

r^{2}-2r+1=0 so (r-1)^2=0

and hence r=1 (with multiplicity 2) so the general solution is of the form

y=Ae^t+Bte^t

The roots of the equation

5184r^2+1827r+169=0

are r=-\frac{13}{72} (with multiplicity 2) so your general solution is of the form...
 
Last edited:
One way to see why the method proposed by Benorin is valid would be to write your solution as

y = A e^{r_1 t} + B e^{r_2 t}


and apply the initial conditions to determine the coefficients. Then let r_2 approach r_1 = r (the root of your actual equation). Usually, l'Hopital's Rule can be applied to yield Benorin's solution.
 
Thanks guys, i don't know if its right or not, but i think my method is right:
http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/6219/lastscan0ku.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top