What happens to an electron when its used in a closed circuit?

AI Thread Summary
Electrons in a closed circuit act as carriers of energy rather than being consumed or altered themselves. When a voltage source is applied, it creates a potential difference that pushes electrons, allowing them to transfer energy to devices like light bulbs or heaters without changing their state. This process can be likened to a series of connected railroad cars, where the movement of one pushes the next, facilitating energy transfer throughout the circuit. In scenarios like photovoltaic panels, the energy carried by electrons is harnessed, but the electrons themselves remain part of the system. Ultimately, the conservation of energy principle applies, as energy is transferred rather than lost or transformed at the electron level.
Air39
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please help me to understand what happens to an electron when its used in a closed circuit.

Main Question: How can electrons within a circuit perform work i.e. illuminate a light bulb or heat a stove and not be lost or changed from one state to another? How could it just stay the same and continue on unchanged in the circuit...??

To reiterate ...I will provide a couple examples that have led to my confusion:

a) To generate an electric current you can rotate a conductor i.e. copper within a magnetic field and produce electric current if its a closed loop. - From what i understand the electrons that are flowing are knocked free from the copper wire and simply flow in a circuit because of the difference in potential that has been generated by the magnetic field. However if the electrons are lighting a bulb or heating a stove...how does the "conservation of energy" not apply? how can you generate heat and light without a change in the state of the electron?

b) Photovoltaic panels - Let's say a photon from the sun knocks an electron free from the n type and transfers it to the p type creating a flow in electricity in the panel; then this flow of electrons is then stored in a battery. If the battery is detached from the system and drained, then reattached and charged...have electrons not been removed from the system? The more i ponder this...Perhaps its not the electron itself that is used but just the energy it carries?

What is actually happening to the electrons being used in a circuit? I have read lots of information and many forums on this concept and i can not get a clear answer.

Please no opinions just facts!

Thanks,
Air39
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF I guess. I see you've had bad experience with asking this question elsewhere on the internet, but fret not.

You've pretty much answered your question. Electrons are just carriers of energy, not the source of that energy themselves.

A pump driving a waterwheel is a fair enough analogy as well. In a closed system the water is just going circles, but it is transferring energy from the pump to the waterwheel.

In that sense it works much the same way as heat does. You don't see material flowing from one place to another with the exchange of heat, but it does carry that heat from one place to another.
 
Electrons in a circuit are like an endless string of railroad cars, each coupled to the next. You push on one and it pushes the next, and that one pushes the next, and so on. So all you have to do is push against one and all along the line each moves on just a little, propelled by the one before it. So no electron needs to traverse the whole path from start to end before you see electricity completing the full circuit. What does the last car push against? It pushes on the first, hence the need for a complete circuit.

What is the force pushing these? It's the voltage from a voltage source of some description, connected somewhere into the circuit.
 
Thanks for your quick and helpful reply guys. Those answers help clear things up.
Much appreciated! This is a useful blog!

Air39
 
Air39 said:
Thanks for your quick and helpful reply guys. Those answers help clear things up.
Much appreciated! This is a useful blog!

Air39

Just FYI, this is not a blog. It is a forum.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top