What Happens to the Cube's Velocity After Colliding with a Pivoting Rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a cube colliding with a pivoting rod. The cube, sliding without friction, undergoes a perfectly elastic collision with the rod, which is initially at rest. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of angular momentum and kinetic energy to solve for the cube's final velocity. The challenge lies in the complexity of the equations derived from these conservation laws, particularly due to the rod's varying speeds along its length. Ultimately, the goal is to express the cube's final velocity in terms of its initial velocity and the rod's dimensions.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cube of mass m slides without friction at a speed vo. It undergoes a perfectly elastic collision with the bottom tip of a rod length d and mass 2m. The rod is pivoted about a frictionless axle through its center, and initially it hangs straight down and is at rest. What is the cube's velocity- both speed and direction after the collision?


Homework Equations


Moment of inertia for rod pivoted about center I=(1/12)mr^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I used conservation of energy

Kcubeinitial = Krotational of rod + Kcubefinal
I replaced angular velocity with v1/.5d

.5mvo^2 = .5mvf^2 + .5(1/12)2md^2 * (v1/.5)^2

Then I used conservation of momentum:
mvo= mvf + 2mv1

But substituting these two equations into each other leads to something I can't solve. Should I try angular momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi bcjochim07,

The problem with using conservation of linear momentum is that the rod does not have a single linear speed--the tip is going fastest, near the pivot is going slow, halfway along the rod it's going half the speed of the tip, etc.

But the entire rod has the same angular speed, so conservation of angular momentum is useful here.
 
Ok, so for angular momentum

mvo*(d/2) = mvf(d/2) + I*omega

v= omega * r omega= v/(d/2)

But I haven't been get the expression for the velocity of the cube yet, which is just a multiple of vo
 
You'll have to use both conservation of kinetic energy and conservation of angular momentum.

Your conservation of kinetic energy formula was

.5mvo^2 = .5mvf^2 + .5(1/12)2md^2 * (v1/.5)^2

but it looks like it's missing a factor of d; omega here is v1/(0.5 d), so the d's will cancel.

Putting this together with your conservation of angular momentum gives two equations in two unknowns (because the answer should be in terms of d and m).
 
Angular momentum:
m(d/2)vo = m(d/2)vf + (1/12)(2m)d^2*(v1/.5d)
(d/2)vo= (d/2)vf + (1/3)dv1
(1/2)vo = (1/2)vf + (1/3)v1

Kinetic energy
.5mvo^2 = .5mvf^2 + .5(1/12)(2m)(d^2)(v1/.5d)^2
.5vo^2=.5vf^2 + (1/12) (v1/.5)^2
.5vo^2=.5vf^2 + (1/3) v1^2

but how do I substitute these into each other to come up with answer, (1/5)vo ?
 
Hi bcjochim07,

You have two equations in two unknowns vf and v1. You can solve one of the equations (the momentum would probably be easiest) for v1 for example and then plug it into the other equation.

(You'll probably have a quadratic equation to solve unless there is a fortuitous cancellation.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top