What Is the Acceleration Ratio a1/a3 in a Frictionless Block and Pulley System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoobeAtPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless block and pulley system, the ratio of the magnitudes of the accelerations of block 1 (a1) to block 3 (a3) is discussed, with the expected answer being 2. A participant initially calculated a1/a3 as -2 due to errors in understanding the relationship between force and acceleration. Clarifications emphasized the importance of using correct dimensions in equations, highlighting that a1 cannot equal T directly without considering mass. The discussion also pointed out the necessity of maintaining dimensional consistency in equations. Ultimately, the correct interpretation of magnitudes and proper algebraic representation were reinforced as critical for solving the problem accurately.
NoobeAtPhysics
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The diagram shows a block and pulley
system where all the surfaces are
frictionless, and all the pulleys are
massless and frictionless.

Once all Blocks have been let go, what is the ratio of the magnitude of the acceleration, a1, of block 1
to the magnitude of the acceleration of Block 3, a3. That is, what is the ratio a1/a3 ?

nyinvm.jpg


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 2 but I get -2.

On block one FBD
m1 * a1 = T
a=T/m1 = T

FBD on block 3

-T=m3 * a3
a3=-T/m3
a3=-T/2

a1/a3 = -2


Any help would be awesome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, the question asks what the ratio of the MAGNITUDES of the accelerations is. Magnitudes are always positive.

Second, you can't write something like a1 = T/m1 = T. This is nonsense. m1 is not equal to 1.0 (a dimensionless number). It's equal to 1.0 kg, (a physical quantity, with dimensions of mass). You can't write an equation that says acceleration = force. You can't equate two different quantities that have different units. Your equations must be dimensionally consistent. You might think I'm just being picky, but I'm not. It's a fundamental error. You can only equate two physical quantities that have the same dimensions (a force to a force, a mass to a mass, an acceleration to an acceleration, etc.).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks.

I understand now, magnitude. Sometimes these words pass by without noticing.

also, you're right I probably should write the units. I always do in my written work but I thought everyone would understand what I meant when I shown the work here.

Thank you
 
NoobeAtPhysics said:
Thanks.

I understand now, magnitude. Sometimes these words pass by without noticing.

also, you're right I probably should write the units. I always do in my written work but I thought everyone would understand what I meant when I shown the work here.

Thank you

No problem. I just wanted to point this out because it is a basic error. Just to make sure it's clear: it's not just that you have to include units after you plug in the numbers. It's also your algebraic equation (with only symbols) that I was complaining about. Saying that a = T is actually wrong, and nonsensical (since you're equating an acceleration to a force). You must write a = T/m, even if m = 1.0 kg. You can't just omit the m, because it's a dimensional quantity, it's not just equal to unity. I hope that is clear.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top