What Is the Acceleration Ratio a1/a3 in a Frictionless Block and Pulley System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoobeAtPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The acceleration ratio a1/a3 in a frictionless block and pulley system is definitively 2. The discussion clarifies that the magnitudes of the accelerations must be considered, emphasizing that a1 is derived from the tension T divided by the mass m1, while a3 is calculated as -T divided by m3. The correct formulation requires maintaining dimensional consistency in equations, highlighting that acceleration cannot be equated directly to force. The final conclusion is that the ratio of the magnitudes of the accelerations is a1/a3 = 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Familiarity with mass and acceleration units
  • Concept of dimensional consistency in physics equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of tension in pulley systems
  • Learn about free body diagram analysis for multi-block systems
  • Explore dimensional analysis in physics equations
  • Investigate the effects of friction in block and pulley systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators teaching concepts related to forces, motion, and dimensional analysis.

NoobeAtPhysics
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The diagram shows a block and pulley
system where all the surfaces are
frictionless, and all the pulleys are
massless and frictionless.

Once all Blocks have been let go, what is the ratio of the magnitude of the acceleration, a1, of block 1
to the magnitude of the acceleration of Block 3, a3. That is, what is the ratio a1/a3 ?

nyinvm.jpg


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 2 but I get -2.

On block one FBD
m1 * a1 = T
a=T/m1 = T

FBD on block 3

-T=m3 * a3
a3=-T/m3
a3=-T/2

a1/a3 = -2


Any help would be awesome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, the question asks what the ratio of the MAGNITUDES of the accelerations is. Magnitudes are always positive.

Second, you can't write something like a1 = T/m1 = T. This is nonsense. m1 is not equal to 1.0 (a dimensionless number). It's equal to 1.0 kg, (a physical quantity, with dimensions of mass). You can't write an equation that says acceleration = force. You can't equate two different quantities that have different units. Your equations must be dimensionally consistent. You might think I'm just being picky, but I'm not. It's a fundamental error. You can only equate two physical quantities that have the same dimensions (a force to a force, a mass to a mass, an acceleration to an acceleration, etc.).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks.

I understand now, magnitude. Sometimes these words pass by without noticing.

also, you're right I probably should write the units. I always do in my written work but I thought everyone would understand what I meant when I shown the work here.

Thank you
 
NoobeAtPhysics said:
Thanks.

I understand now, magnitude. Sometimes these words pass by without noticing.

also, you're right I probably should write the units. I always do in my written work but I thought everyone would understand what I meant when I shown the work here.

Thank you

No problem. I just wanted to point this out because it is a basic error. Just to make sure it's clear: it's not just that you have to include units after you plug in the numbers. It's also your algebraic equation (with only symbols) that I was complaining about. Saying that a = T is actually wrong, and nonsensical (since you're equating an acceleration to a force). You must write a = T/m, even if m = 1.0 kg. You can't just omit the m, because it's a dimensional quantity, it's not just equal to unity. I hope that is clear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K