What is the Accreting Matter Paradox in Astrophysics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StatusX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Paradox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of an infinitely conducting gas accreting to a star in a magnetic field, specifically in the context of an E-field component, E_\theta, that is dependent on r. It is established that in steady state, E_\theta must be proportional to 1/r, while density approaches a constant at infinity, leading to v_r being proportional to 1/r^2 and B_r also proportional to 1/r^2. The relationship derived suggests that E_\theta is linked to B_\phi and v_\phi, resulting in a contradiction where either v_\phi or B_\phi must diverge as r approaches infinity. This raises questions about the assumptions made in the model and invites insights into resolving the apparent absurdity. The discussion seeks clarification on the underlying issues in this magnetic field and gas accretion scenario.
StatusX
Homework Helper
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2
In the course of treating the problem of an infinitely conducting gas accreting to a star in the presence of a magnetic field, I ran across the following problem. If the magnetic field and velocity are confined to a plane (which we'll call the \theta=\pi/2 plane), and if they only depend on r, then the only component of E is:

E_\theta = \frac{1}{c} (v_r B_\phi - v_\phi B_r)

In the steady state, \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = 0, and this requires E_\theta \propto 1/r. It is reasonable to assume that the density approaches some constant non-zero value at infinity, which by the continuity equation \rho v_r r^2= const implies v_r \propto 1/r^2. Also \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} =0 implies B_r \propto 1/r^2. Then for some non-zero constant \kappa

1/r \propto E_\theta \propto (B_\phi - \kappa v_\phi)/r^2

But then B_\phi - \alpha v_\phi \propto r, so at least one of v_\phi, B\phi must blow up as r goes to infinity, clearly absurd. What is the problem here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have any ideas?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top