What is the angle of incidence on a cubic zirconia crystal submerged in oil?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aliciadombros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Snell's law
AI Thread Summary
A light ray entering a cubic zirconia crystal submerged in oil travels at an angle of 25 degrees with respect to the normal. The discussion revolves around calculating the angle of incidence using the equation n1 sin(θ1) = n2 sin(θ2), where the index of refraction for oil is 1.46 and for zirconia is 2.18. There is confusion regarding the correct values for the indices of refraction and the resulting calculations, with one participant arriving at an angle of 39 degrees while another references an answer of 35 degrees from a book. The consensus indicates that the book's answer may be incorrect, as calculations consistently yield 39 degrees. The discussion highlights the importance of verifying source material for accuracy in physics problems.
aliciadombros
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A costume jewelry pendant made of cubic zirconia is submerged in oil. A light ray enters one face of the zirconia crystal, then travels at an angle of 25 degrees with respect to the normal. What was the ray's angle of incidence on the crystal?



Relevant equations:

n1 sin(θ1) = n2 sin(θ2)



n1 sin(θ1) = n2 sin(θ2)
2.18 sin(θ1) = 1.46 sin(65)
θ1=37 degrees but the real answer is 35.

Any help to where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi aliciadombros and welcome to PF. What is medium 1 and what is medium 2? It seems that if you are looking for the angle on the crystal and the unknown angle is θ1, then medium 1 must be oil and medium 2 must be zirconia. You used 2.18 for n1. Is the index of refraction for oil 2.18?
 
I must've flipped them around. The index of refraction for oil is 1.46. But, when I plugged the information into the equation the way you told me,

n1 sin(θ1) = n2 sin(θ2)
1.46 sin(θ1) = 2.18 (sin 25)
θ1= 39, not 35.

Am I using the wrong angle measurement or is it my calculations that are off?
 
Your last solution is correct. I plugged in the numbers and the answer that I get agrees with yours, 39 degrees. How sure are you that the answer is 35 degrees? Sometimes posted answers or answers in the back of the book are incorrect.
 
Thank you for the help. I looked in the back of the book and it said 35 degrees, but I guess it's wrong.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top