What is the angular speed in revolution per minute?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the angular speed in revolutions per minute (rpm) for a new amusement park ride with a 14.2-ft diameter and a centripetal acceleration of 3g, the radius is calculated as 2.16 meters. The required centripetal acceleration translates to a velocity of 7.97 m/s. Using the relationship between linear velocity and angular speed, the angular speed is initially found to be 3.69 rad/s. However, a calculation error occurs in the conversion to rpm, leading to an incorrect final answer. The discussion emphasizes the importance of working with symbols initially to minimize errors in calculations.
jimmyboykun
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are consulting for an amusement park that wants to build a new "Rotor" ride. In order to increase capacity, they would like to build a unit with a 14.2-ft diameter. The Rotor should provide a centripetal acceleration of 3g. What must be the angular speed in revolutions per minute (rpm)?



Homework Equations



a(centripedal)= v^2/radius
v=ωr

The Attempt at a Solution


1ft=0.3048m---> 14.2ft*0.3048m/ft= 4.33m

4.33/2= 2.16(this is the radius)

3(9.81m/s^2)= 29.43m/s^2

v^2=2.16*29.43m/s^2=63.5688

sqrtv=sqrt63.5688=7.97m/s

v=ωr
7.97m/s=ω2.16

7.97/2.16=ω

ω=3.69rad/s

3.69rad/s*1rev/2∏*60s/1m= 344.77rpm

344.77rpm is my final answer but I got that wrong, where did I go wrong in my calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like you are taking the correct steps. However, I get a different numerical answer than you do.

Also, may I suggest that you don't plug all of those numbers in immediately, and just work with symbols until you have an expression for what it is you are looking for? It'll make the work easier for you, and you'll be less error prone.
 
It's correct up to the very last step. Then, you got the decimal point in the wrong place.

Chet
 
yeah I realize that. it seems that I have to convert rad/s to rpm
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top