What is the Angular Speed of a Falling Rod?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The angular speed of a falling rod pivoted at one end can be calculated using the conservation of energy principle. When a rod of length L and mass M is released from a horizontal position, its potential energy decreases as it swings down to a vertical position. The correct potential energy at the initial state is Mg(L/2), leading to the formula for angular speed w as √(3g/L). This correction is crucial as it accounts for the center of mass of the rod, which is located at L/2 from the pivot point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and angular velocity
  • Familiarity with the concept of moment of inertia, specifically I = 1/3 ML²
  • Knowledge of potential and kinetic energy conservation principles
  • Basic principles of center of mass in rigid body dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes, focusing on rods and disks
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in rotational motion
  • Explore the concept of center of mass and its applications in physics problems
  • Investigate the effects of friction and air resistance on angular motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rigid bodies and angular motion, particularly in the context of mechanics and energy conservation.

j2013
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rod of length L and mass M is pivoted about one end. The rod is released from rest in a horizontal position, and allowed to swing downward without friction or air resistance. When the rod is vertical, what is its angular speed w?

Homework Equations



Moment of Inertia, I = 1/3 ML^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I would like to apologize in advance if my notations are difficult to read.

Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf
0 + MgL = (1/2) Iw^2 + 0
MgL = (1/2)(1/3 ML^2)w^2
√6g/L = w

I think I'm supposed to use the rod's center of mass because my current answer is wrong and since the diagram in my book points out that the center of mass is at L/2 from the pivot point. I don't think they would point that out if it was unnecessary, but I don't understand why. Putting Ui as Mg(L/2) gives me the right answer though, according to the back of the book.

Any help clarifying this would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
j2013 said:

Homework Equations



Moment of Inertia, I = 1/3 ML^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I would like to apologize in advance if my notations are difficult to read.

Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf
0 + MgL = (1/2) Iw^2 + 0
MgL = (1/2)(1/3 ML^2)w^2
√6g/L = w

I think I'm supposed to use the rod's center of mass because my current answer is wrong and since the diagram in my book points out that the center of mass is at L/2 from the pivot point. I don't think they would point that out if it was unnecessary, but I don't understand why. Putting Ui as Mg(L/2) gives me the right answer though, according to the back of the book.

Any help clarifying this would be much appreciated.


Your I value is correct.
Ui is not MgL. Ui is MgL/2 because height is distance between initial CM point and final CM point. Perpendicular distance between two CM is L/2. So calculate again to find angular velocity.
 
j2013 said:

I think I'm supposed to use the rod's center of mass because my current answer is wrong and since the diagram in my book points out that the center of mass is at L/2 from the pivot point. I don't think they would point that out if it was unnecessary, but I don't understand why. Putting Ui as Mg(L/2) gives me the right answer though, according to the back of the book.


Yes, the potential energy of a homogeneous rod of length L gets mgL/2 lower when it swings down from horizontal position into vertical.

Think of the road as a chain of N small pieces, each of mass Δm=M/N.

Initially, all pieces are at the same height. When the rod swings to vertical position the height of the piece at the pivot does not change, but the end moves down by L. The middle, which is the centre of mass for a homogeneous rod, moves down by L/2. If you take a piece at distance x from the CM, the piece above the CM has Δmxg higher PE than the CM, and the piece below the CM has PE Δmxg lower than the CM, the sum of the PE of both pieces is -2ΔmgL/2 with respect to the original horizontal position. Doing the same for all pair of pieces you get that the final PE= -NΔm*gL/2 = MgL/2 with respect to the horizontal position of the rod.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K