What is the best book on cosmology for all levels of knowledge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter think
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Cosmology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on recommendations for cosmology books suitable for various knowledge levels. For beginners, "An Introduction to Modern Cosmology" by Andrew Liddle is suggested, along with a visually rich encyclopedia. Intermediate readers are directed to "Relativity, Gravitation and Cosmology: A Basic Introduction" by Ta-Pei Cheng. Advanced readers are advised to consider titles like "Modern Cosmology" by Scott Dodelson, "Physical Foundations of Cosmology" by Viatcheslav Mukhanov, and "Cosmology" by Steven Weinberg for comprehensive insights. Additionally, "Big Bang" by Simon Singh is highlighted as an engaging beginner's read that covers the history of cosmological theories.
think
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I would be thankful to you, if you tell me which book do you consider to be best, on the subject of cosmology, for:

1. Begineers
2. Intermediates
3. Advanced

Thanks in advanced.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I can only speak for beginners:

1. Go to your book store, I good one with a good selection, and look for the big black book that has a lot of high quality photo pages of nebulas and other great things. It's kind of a visual (and textual) encyclopedia on the various occurances at different levels of magnification. It's a visual orgasm, or perhaps multiple visual orgasms. But not a cheap thrill mind you as it's a bit expensive.
 
I don't know if it will still help you after so many months on your original post. Anyway, assuming you are a physics student and want the real deal, try these ones:

Beginner: An Introduction to Modern Cosmology, Andrew Liddle

Intermediate: Relativity, Gravitation and Cosmology: A Basic Introduction, Ta-Pei Cheng

Advanced: The next three cover all of the "core" of cosmology in a no nonsense fashion, I indicate what I find its particular strength:

Modern Cosmology by Scott Dodelson (want to calculate something in the cmb? some linear perturbation? it is surely here)

Physical Foundations of Cosmology by Viatcheslav Mukhanov (perturbation theory from the man that developed it)

Cosmology by Steven Weinberg (the ultimate reference on the topic of cosmology, period).

For the "grand view" I believe The Early Universe by Kolb and Turner is still excellent despite its age.

Very focused:

The Primordial Density Perturbation: Cosmology, Inflation and the Origin of Structure by Liddle and Lyth.

Elements of String Cosmology by Maurizio Gasperini.

These two ones are obviously for aspiring theoreticians in early universe. What if you are more about Large Scale Structure, then try

Galaxy Formation and Evolution by Houjun Mo, Frank van den Bosch and Simon White.

If you are more into the data analysis of tons of data using modern methods then go for

Bayesian Methods in Cosmology by Hobson, Liddle et al.

Hope it helped.
 
  • Like
Likes Goldman clarck, FourEyedRaven and jamalkoiyess
good info for me. Any authors too look for/ stay away from?

My local library has a pretty short selection in space stuff
 
My favorite is Big Bang, by Simon Singh. It is a beginner's introduction to the history of cosmology from ancient times to today, covering most all cosmological views of the universe from ancient times up to and including the battle between the Big Bang and Steady State theories. Singh is a fabulous storyteller. He makes the subject extremely compelling.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top