What is the best physics dictionary for advanced-level vocabulary?

AI Thread Summary
For those seeking a physics dictionary with advanced vocabulary suitable for navigating professional papers, recommendations highlight the importance of comprehensiveness, particularly in classical and modern physics, astrophysics, and plasma physics. Two specific dictionaries are mentioned: one from Oxford University Press and another from Cambridge University Press, both of which are noted for their thorough coverage of terminology in these fields. These resources are ideal for professionals and students aiming to deepen their understanding of complex physics concepts.
darkchild
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a physics dictionary. I need something that has advanced-level vocabulary (I'll mostly be using it to wade through professional physics papers), and, though I would prefer it to be as comprehensive as possible, my main fields of interest are classical and modern physics, astrophysics, and plasma physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top