A What is the best program for MSEM? Student Request

Knowledge Sponge
My research requires using the multilevel structural equation model (MSEM). I've read countless articles related to MSEM and I have not been able to pinpoint the best program. They vary from SPSS, MPlus, SAS, LISREL, AMOS, R2, etc. Any recommendations? I've asked around my academic circle and can't get a clear answer. I currently have R2 and SAS but I was leaning towards SPSS or MPlus. This is an out of pocket expense and I don't want to purchase an ineffective program that can't handle the enormous amount of data.

Here's the basic information for my research:
3 levels
Nested within- and between-
Level 1- Group
Level 2- Confounding Variables = quantity 3
Level 3- Latent Variables = quantity 6
Data source is 33 Likert-type questions on a 5-point scale
Sample size range 250-800

I plan to run the following tests:
EFS: Bartlett's test, KMO anti-image correlation matrix RMSEA, SRMSRb and cut-off factor loading CA Culmulative variance.
PLS: loadings, cross-loadings, Fronell-Larcker criterion, CA, CR, and AVE.
GoF: R2, CFI, and TLI.
I will also calculate R2, f2, and Q2.

Thank you in advance for your recommendations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you looked at Matlab and any of its statistical toolboxes? The student price is reasonable.

Alternatives would be Octave, numerical Python, or Julia. Julia is interesting and can interoperate with other languages like C, R, Python and Fortran.
 
No, I am not familiar with Matlab. I will definitely look it up along with the other ones you recommended. Thank you very much!
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top