What is the Center of Mass of a Rod with Varying Linear Density?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass and center of mass of a rod with a varying linear density defined by λ = 50.0 g/m + 20.0x g/m². The correct approach involves integrating the linear density function to find the mass and center of mass, rather than treating λ as a constant. Participants clarify that the integration should be performed over the length of the rod, leading to the correct mass of 15.9 g and center of mass at 0.159 m from one end. The importance of correctly applying integration techniques to variable functions is emphasized. Understanding these calculations is crucial for success in related physics problems.
bolivartech
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rod of length 30.0 cm has linear density (mass-per-length) given by

λ = 50.0 g/m + 20.0x g/m2

where x is the distance from one end, measured in meters. (a) What is the mass of the rod?

(b) How far from the x = 0 end is the center of mass?

Homework Equations



Xcm = l/2

The Attempt at a Solution



λ = 50.0 g/m + (20.0)(.3m) g/m2

λ = 56 g/m * .3 m

λ = 16.8 g

Xcm = .3/2 = .15

The actual answers are 15.9 g and .159 m

Am I not using the formulas correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m=\int\limits_0^L \lambda(x) {\rm d}x

x_G=\frac 1 m \int\limits_0^L x\lambda(x) {\rm d}x
 
Would I consider λ a constant.

m = λ1/2x2

m = (50.0 g/m + (20.0)(.3m) g/m2)(1/2)(.32)

of integrate it as well. Both ways that doesn't seem to be the right answer either. I get 2.43 if I integrate λ, and 2.52 if I don't.
 
bolivartech said:
Would I consider λ a constant.

\lambda(x) is a function of x that happens to be 50.0 + 20.0x, so you replace

\lambda(x) by 50.0 + 20.0x and integrate the result.
 
This is ridiculously when you put it that way. Thanks, I understand how to apply the formulas now. Hopefully when it gets rearranged for a test I will still see it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top