What is the Charge in a 1.70 cm Section of a Line with a Given Electric Field?

Aserap
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
HELP! Charge for an electric field

The electric field 0.375 {\rm m} from a very long uniform line of charge is 830 {\rm N/C}.

How much charge is contained in a section of the line of length 1.70 {\rm cm}?

I started doing this problem, and though it was the right approach, but then i continually get the wrong answer, i have two more tries left. this is what i did:

I used the equation:
E = q/ 4*pi*E0*r^{}2
and plugged in the electric field number given, with the known length of the line to get the charge of the particle... which came out to 1.30x10^-8 and from my own assumptions i thought regardless of what r is the charge should be the same, but it doesn't work. Can someone please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wrong formula

Aserap said:
I used the equation:
E = q/ 4*pi*E0*r^{}2
That formula describes the electric field from a point charge. You want a formula describing the field from a line charge.
 


i used this equation as the line charge
E= q/ 2*pi*Eo*r
at least this is the only one that i found, it not labeled in the book.
i used 830 for E and .017 for r and solved for q... i got 7.85x10^-10.
This isn't right. i was thinking could r be .375- .017 or something of that nature. i only have one more try to get this answer correct, and i feel so close but i keep getting wrong answers.
 


Aserap said:
i used this equation as the line charge
E= q/ 2*pi*Eo*r
That equation isn't quite right. Instead of q, you should have \lambda, which is the charge per unit length. Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electric/elecyl.html#c1".

Once you figure out the charge per unit length, you can calculate the charge in that segment of the line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top