What Is the Charge of q if the Net Force on the 1.0 mC Charge Is Zero?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the charge of an unknown particle, denoted as q, given that the net force on a 1.0 mC charge is zero. Participants are analyzing the forces acting on the charges in a system, particularly focusing on the interactions between the known charges and the unknown charge q.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the 1.0 mC charge and how the charge q must balance these forces. There is an exploration of the reasoning behind the calculations for q, including considerations of force directions and magnitudes. Questions are raised about whether the forces from the bottom particles should also be considered in the analysis.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's reasoning, noting the importance of understanding the fixed position of the charges and the implications for force calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the charges and how they affect one another, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the system's configuration and the interactions between multiple charges, particularly in relation to the fixed position of the charges involved. There is mention of potential confusion regarding the forces acting in different directions and the overall symmetry of the charge distribution.

RyanBruceX
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In this diagram, the net force on the 1.0 mC charge is zero. What is the sign and magnitude of the unknown charge q? Please see attached photo.
[/B]

Homework Equations


F = KQ1Q2/r^2[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have approached this by first determining the force required by “q” on the middle particle to maintain the system in its current position. Because the 2 bottom particles cancel in the “x” direction the combined force they place on the middle particle is 2Fy? And so “q” must also place a force of 2Fy but in the -y direction on the middle particle. So by this rationale I should be able to calculate the charge of “q” using q = (2Fy)(r^2)/(k)(Q1) where Q1 is the middle particle.
q = (8.65 x 10^6 N)(0.0009 m^2) / (9.0 x 10^9 N M2/C2)(1.0 x 10^-3 C) = 8.65 x 10^-4 C positive charge?

I am assuming I do not have to use the vector method to determine the force of q because it also has equal components in both the - and + x directions which cancel. So net force is just in the y direction and this is used to calculate the charge?

The magnitude of this charge seems low to me, I would have expected a more symmetrical charge. Should I be considering the forces between q and the bottom two particles?[/B]
 

Attachments

  • photo.JPG
    photo.JPG
    43.6 KB · Views: 572
Physics news on Phys.org
Misread the question. Please ignore my previous post.
 
Last edited:
Your work looks fine. Note that q doesn't just produce "equal components in both the - and + x directions which cancel", it produces NO components in the in those directions when it acts on the 1mC charge (or, technically, they are zero valued).

The charge may seem small but keep in mind it is closer to the 1mC charge than the others and the force varies as the inverse square of the separation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RyanBruceX
Thank you very much! I forgot about this being a "fixed position" question. My thoughts on the -/+ x direction components for "q" were based on the forces between "q" and the bottom particles. Would they not also produce a force at an angle towards "q" as they do towards the middle particle? I just have a hard time conceptualizing this problem, my solution was approached by breaking the system up. Focusing on the effect of the bottom particles on the middle particle only, and then focusing on the equal and opposite effect of "q" on the middle particle (forgetting fixation). So while I may have come up with the right answer it was wrong reasoning. When I look at the system as a whole It would seem to me that all the particles should exert a force on each other and so "q" should feel a force of 2Fy (using q and 2 mC as charges, and the distance q to the bottom particle) plus the Force of the middle particle on q. Unless somehow 2Fy using 1 mC and 2 mC and the distance from the bottom to middle provides the same magnitude...
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K