gracy
- 2,486
- 83
How can we know this time Earth will give charges and at the other instance it won't?
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around determining the charge on the plates of a parallel plate capacitor given the area and separation between the plates. Participants explore the relationship between capacitance, voltage, and charge in the context of electrostatics.
The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on the relationships between charge, voltage, and capacitance, while others are questioning the assumptions made about charge distribution and grounding.
There are discussions about the implications of grounding on charge distribution, the assumptions regarding voltage references, and the potential for different charge distributions on the plates based on their connections in the circuit.
How so? The batteries are driving charge in the direction that a current would flow.gracy said:Should not q transfer direction be other way around in #54?
The charges are available if needed. If they are not needed, none are "borrowed".gracy said:How can we know this time Earth will give charges and the other it won't?
When there is a potential difference between earthed plate and other plate(s), Earth will give charge.gracy said:How can we know this time Earth will give charges and the other it won't?
I believe its the potential difference.gracy said:What is called " need" in this context?
I've assumed conventional current, where charge carriers are assumed to be positive. It's less likely to confuse others if we stick to the convention.gracy said:I am taking q to be electron because it is electron which actually travels.
And when Earth takes charge?cnh1995 said:When there is a potential difference between earthed plate and other plate(s), Earth will give charge.
When Earth is at higher potential then the other plate(s).gracy said:And when Earth takes charge?
A potential difference that requires charges to move. They have to come from somewhere. If they are available from an external connection then that's where they come from. If the plate were isolated then existing charges could only be re-arranged, and charge separation would occur.gracy said:What is called " need" in this context?
cnh1995 said:When Earth is at higher potential then the other plate(s).
Yes. When 'ground' is assumed at +ve terminal.gracy said:You meant when earthed plate is at higher potential then the other plate(s)?
Yes.gracy said:When Earth gives electron?
when earthed plate is at lower potential then the other plate(s)?
By convention, +ve side is considered as higher potential side.gracy said:How can we know earthed plate is at higher or lower potential than the other plate(s)?
Here side means?cnh1995 said:By convention, +ve side is considered as higher potential side.
Sorry, I meant +ve charged part of the circuit like +ve terminal of the battery.gracy said:Here side means?
plate with net positive charge is at higher potential and plate with net negative charge is at lower potential,right?cnh1995 said:Sorry, I meant +ve charged part of the circuit like +ve terminal of the battery.
Yes, by convention.gracy said:plate with net positive charge is at higher potential and plate with net negative charge is at lower potential,right?
There is. It's established by the two batteries. Plate a is at +V with respect to the middle plate, and plate c is at -V with respect to the middle plate.gracy said:Why there is no potential difference between earthed plate and other plate(s) in #39
I believe that's because it is connected to +ve terminal of one battery and -ve terminal of the other battery.gracy said:Then why no charge transfer occur from Earth as charge are transferred from Earth if there is potential difference between earthed plate and the other plate(s)?
Formation of net -ve charge is avoided by the +ve terminal of one battery and formation of +ve charges is avoided by the -ve terminal of the other battery. However, if the two battery voltages were different, there would be net charge on the middle plate.cnh1995 said:I believe that's because it is connected to +ve terminal of one battery and -ve terminal of the other battery.
This is not correct as I have pointed out previously. The charge on a plate does not determine its potential. The potential of a plate does not determine its charge.cnh1995 said:Yes, by convention.
I agree. But in case of a battery, isn't +ve terminal considered as higher potential conventionally? Also, conventional current is assumed to be from higher potential to lower potential and its direction is shown from +ve to -ve terminal of the battery. So, if a capacitor is connected across a battery, its +vely charged plate will be at higher potential than the -ve plate. That's what I meant in that post.jbriggs444 said:This is not correct as I have pointed out previously. The charge on a plate does not determine its potential. The potential of a plate does not determine its charge.
Agreed, the relatively more positively charged plate will be at a higher potential than the relatively less positively charged plate.cnh1995 said:I agree. But in case of a battery, isn't +ve terminal considered as higher potential conventionally? Also, conventional current is assumed to be from higher potential to lower potential and its direction is shown from +ve to -ve terminal of the battery. So, if a capacitor is connected across a battery, its +vely charged plate will be at higher potential than the -ve plate. That's what I meant in that post.