What is the common error when discussing the photoelectric effect?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the common misconceptions regarding the photoelectric effect, specifically the relationship between intensity (I), frequency (f), and maximum kinetic energy (KE_max) of emitted electrons. The equation KE_max = IA/N - W is pivotal, illustrating that while intensity is often thought to depend solely on the number of photons (N), it also varies with frequency. The key takeaway is that increasing intensity while keeping frequency constant does not affect KE_max, whereas increasing frequency does. This distinction is crucial for students to grasp the underlying physics accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect
  • Familiarity with the equation KE_max = IA/N - W
  • Knowledge of the concepts of intensity and frequency in light
  • Basic principles of photon theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of varying intensity and frequency on KE_max in the photoelectric effect
  • Explore the concept of photon energy and its relationship with frequency
  • Investigate common misconceptions in teaching the photoelectric effect
  • Review experimental setups that demonstrate the photoelectric effect
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, students studying quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the principles of the photoelectric effect and its implications in modern physics.

Aurora_b
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Why KE_(max) depends on frequency but doesn't depend on intensity? (This isn't exactly my homework but a related conceptual doubt i have in order to solve the homework questions)
Relevant Equations
So the confusion arose when my teacher wrote the equation for photoelectric effect:

KE_max = hf - W ------ eqn 1)
where,
KE_max = maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons.
f= frequency of incident radiation
W= work function of the metal

Then the teacher wrote the formula for intensity
I = Nhf/A ------- eqn 2)

where,
N = no of photons incident per unit time
f= frequency of incident radiation
A= Area

Then the following statement was made:
Statement 1: KE_max depends on frequency but doesn't depend on Intensity.
I would believe the last statement if Intensity only depended on N but it also depends on the frequency f. Now if Intensity depends on f we can also find a relationship between KE_max and Intensity by substituting from eqn 2) in eqn 1)

KE_max = IA/N - W

So if KE_max depends on f and I depends on f then we can find the dependence between KE_max and I.

I understand I am wrong and that statement 1 is correct but I am just unable to convince myself, because everyowhere the reasoning is that I depends on N so it is independent but I also depends on f. Please help me understand.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Aurora_b said:
KE_max = IA/N - W

So if KE_max depends on f and I depends on f then we can find the dependence between KE_max and I.

Consider your (correct) equation: KE_max = IA/N - W

Suppose you double the intensity. That means (using the concept of photons) that N must have doubled. So what happens to KE_max?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Steve4Physics said:
Suppose you double the intensity. That means (using the concept of photons) that N must have doubled. So what happens to KE_max?
Be careful.

If you double the intensity by doubling the frequency then you will increase KE_max.
If you double the intensity without changing the frequency then you will not.

When the text suggests that KE_max is independent of intensity, it is with the unstated assumption that frequency is being held constant. (e.g. you are shining two identical lights on the illuminated area, not switching from a red lamp to a blue).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Steve4Physics
jbriggs444 said:
Be careful.

If you double the intensity by doubling the frequency then you will increase KE_max.
If you double the intensity without changing the frequency then you will not.

When the text suggests that KE_max is independent of intensity, it is with the unstated assumption that frequency is being held constant. (e.g. you are shining two identical lights on the illuminated area, not switching from a red lamp to a blue).
Thankyou! I was being careless and didn't read the original Post carefully.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and jbriggs444
One of the biggest traps / most common errors in the levels I teach is when the question asks students to say what happens, in terms of number of electrons and ke of electrons (i) if intensity is increased keeping frequency the same (usually well answered) and (ii) if the frequency is increased keeping intensity the same (far more poorly answered).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
13K