What Is the Commutator [Le, Lf] in Terms of e, f, and L?

Monalisa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let e and f be unit vectors. Le = eL is the definition of the component of angular momentum in direction e. Calculate the commutator [Le,Lf ] in terms of e, f and L

Homework Equations


[A,B]=(AB-BA)

The Attempt at a Solution



we know that L=r x p, in classical mechanics, and in quantum physics we have the operators for angular momentum in cartesian coordinates for example, but in my problem I have just two direction, e and f, and I am obtaining as answering 0. How can I do this exercise ? thanks
upload_2015-2-4_23-34-19.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Since you know the commutation relations for the Cartesian components of L, it might be a good idea to write out e##\cdot##L and f##\cdot##L in terms of the Cartesian components of L.
 
Are the unit vectors ##\hat{e}## and ##\hat{f}## some arbitrary unit vectors in Cartesian space? In that case, it might be easy to start with something simple such as ##\hat{e} = \hat{x}## and ##\hat{f} = \hat{y}## and then moving into a more general case.
 
but, and about the z component for example, if I do this in two coordenates, the answer will be zero, maybe is zero the solution, I do not know
 
Why zero ? Follow Sigurdsson's sound advice and post your workings, please.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top